A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




XB273U F
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for the fastest response times and high refresh rates, the Asus XB273U F with its excellent motion handling might be ideal, but it's pricier and doesn't excel in media consumption. For a vivid, high-contrast gaming and media experience, the Acer X34V with its impressive color and contrast would be great, especially at a lower price point, although it's not the best for productivity tasks due to its ultrawide aspect ratio. Neither are ideal for HDR video editing, but for casual gaming, watching movies, and photo editing without breaking the bank, the Acer could be the preferred choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Good text clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
XB273U F
7.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1242:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good.

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
XB273U F
9.5
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.4 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
XB273U F
6.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
XB273U F
6.3
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1242:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$700
X34V
XB273U F
$1,100
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Asus XB273U F (IPS) costs $1,100.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
XB273U F
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
XB273U F
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
XB273U F
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
XB273U F
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Asus XB273U F (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Asus XB273U F (IPS)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Asus XB273U F (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$1,100
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
175Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11242:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits488 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits468 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %99.6 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms5.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo