A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·
If you're looking for an immersive gaming experience with deeper blacks and higher contrast, especially for HDR gaming, the Acer X34V with its OLED technology would be a better fit. However, this comes with a higher price tag. On the other hand, the Asus PA279CV offers better text clarity and color accuracy for digital photo editing and tasks that require precise color reproduction, like print photo editing, at a more affordable price. It isn't as suitable for gaming due to its lower refresh rate and isn't the best choice for HDR content. Choose the Acer for gaming and media, or the Asus for productivity and photo editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
- Best in class for casual gaming
- Best in class for media consumption
- Good refresh rate
- Best in class contrast
- Best in class color volume
- Best in class response time
Advantages of the Asus PA279CV (IPS)
- Good for productivity
- Very good text clarity
- Very good image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.6
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
920:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
80.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.7
7.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.5
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
920:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$700
$399
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Asus PA279CV (IPS) costs $399.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.2
4.9
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
17.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 60 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Asus PA279CV (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Acer X34V (QD-OLED) | Asus PA279CV (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$700 | $399 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 34" | 27" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | OLED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | QD-OLED | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 8 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | Inf:1 | 920:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 250 nits | 376 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 436 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 104 % | 99.3 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 1 ms | 17 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 175 Hz | 48 - 60 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.2/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9.6/10 | 6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 163 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.6/10 | 8/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 1 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Asus PA279CV (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
PC World
Matthew Smith | April 2022
"Asus’ ProArt PA279CV is a sensible choice for content creators who want a color accurate 4K monitor but don’t want to clean out their savings account. It edges out alternatives like the BenQ PD2720U and Dell S2722QC in brightness and contrast without giving up ground on connectivity or menu options."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Acer X34V (QD-OLED) vs. AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Acer X34V (QD-OLED) vs. Pixio PX277 OLED Max (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Acer X34V (QD-OLED) vs. Nubia RedMagic GM001J (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare Asus PA279CV (IPS) vs. Dell S2722QC (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PA279CV (IPS) vs. LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PA279CV (IPS) vs. LG 27GP850 (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
