If you prioritize high-end gaming with deep blacks and vibrant colors, the Acer X27U with its OLED panel offers exceptional contrast and is excellent for HDR gaming and media. However, the price is significantly higher. On the other hand, the MSI MAG274QRF-QD is more affordable and still delivers good overall performance with strong color accuracy, making it suitable for tasks like digital photo editing, and it has a higher refresh rate which benefits competitive gaming. The MSI may not excel in HDR content compared to the Acer, reflecting its lower price point. If cost is a concern and you seek a well-rounded monitor, the MSI is a solid choice, while the Acer is for those who want top-tier visuals and are willing to invest more. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good for competitive gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
Good text clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
6.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
8.8/10
5.8/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
9.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$1,000
$436
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) costs $436.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
5.8/10
6.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD has the largest color gamut we’ve ever seen and near-perfect out-of-box accuracy. sRGB content will be oversaturated though, and HDR doesn’t do anything for image quality."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.