If you are on a tighter budget but still want a quality gaming monitor, the Acer X27U offers excellent gaming performance at a more affordable price, though it might not be as well suited for productivity tasks due to its smaller screen and lower resolution. On the other hand, for an immersive gaming and media experience, the MSI 45GS96QB with its larger screen and higher resolution would be superior especially for productivity, but this comes at a higher cost. Neither is the best choice if image clarity and text quality are top priorities. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
Very good for competitive gaming
Good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Acer X27U (W-OLED).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.8/10
5.9/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
2.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$1,000
$1,700
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.