A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




45GS96QB
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you are on a tighter budget but still want a quality gaming monitor, the Acer X27U offers excellent gaming performance at a more affordable price, though it might not be as well suited for productivity tasks due to its smaller screen and lower resolution. On the other hand, for an immersive gaming and media experience, the MSI 45GS96QB with its larger screen and higher resolution would be superior especially for productivity, but this comes at a higher cost. Neither is the best choice if image clarity and text quality are top priorities. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
  • The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Acer X27U (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
45GS96QB
5.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
45GS96QB
2.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
45GS96QB
5.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
45GS96QB
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
45GS96QB
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
45GS96QB
9.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
45GS96QB
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
45GS96QB
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
45GS96QB
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$1,700
Screen Size
27"45"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/101.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/102.5/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo