A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize high-end gaming with fluid motions and are looking for exceptional contrast and color depth, the Acer X27U with its OLED panel is an excellent option despite its higher cost. It presents strong performance in casual and competitive gaming, but note that it may not be the best for productivity tasks. Conversely, if your focus is on productivity, particularly if you deal with digital photo editing, the LG DualUp offers a unique screen with more vertical space and good color accuracy at a lower price, but it's not as well-suited for high-performance gaming or HDR video content. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
4.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
6.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
$700
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$700
Screen Size
27"28"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 2880
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo