A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and require top-notch response times, the Acer X27U with its wider refresh rate and OLED panel is an excellent choice. However, the LG 34WQ73A offers a larger, ultrawide screen that's better for multitasking and productivity, albeit with a less suitable refresh rate for competitive gaming. For media consumption, the Acer’s better contrast and suitability for HDR will offer a more vibrant viewing experience, whereas the LG falls short in HDR performance. Keep in mind, the Acer's OLED could carry the risk of burn-in over long periods, which should be a consideration for static content. If budget is a concern, the LG provides a cost-effective solution, but for a premium gaming and cinematic experience, the Acer is superior. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
34WQ73A
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
34WQ73A
3.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
34WQ73A
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
34WQ73A
$400
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
34WQ73A
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
34WQ73A
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
34WQ73A
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.8
X27U
34WQ73A
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ73A (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
34WQ73A
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$400
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo