The Acer X27U offers an exceptional gaming experience with outstanding color depth, high contrast, and high resolution, making it suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption. It shines in competitive gaming due to its very responsive screen with minimal ghosting. However, it falls short in productivity tasks due to lower brightness when compared to some other options. Conversely, the LG 34GN850B, while less expensive, provides a larger screen and good quality for productivity and media with a fair resolution and color accuracy, but it's less suitable for competitive gaming due to a slower response time and lower refresh rate. If budget is less of a concern and you prioritize gaming performance and HDR content, the Acer is a solid choice, otherwise, for balanced use and a tighter budget, consider the LG. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good for competitive gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34GN850B (IPS)
The LG 34GN850B (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Acer X27U (W-OLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
950:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
8.8/10
4.5/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
950:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
359 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,000
$750
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 34GN850B (IPS) costs $750.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34GN850B (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
5.8/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GN850B (IPS) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 34GN850B (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 34GN850B (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Mid-range 3440 x 1440 144Hz VA monitors are ~$500 to $600 these days. You are getting a much better product for the higher price of the LG, with faster response times and better colors (outside of the contrast ratio), but this is definitely a monitor that is reserved for those that want the best of the best and are willing to pay for it."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.