A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming with the best response times and can afford a premium price, the Acer X27U might suit you well, but it falls short for productivity tasks. Conversely, the LG 27GS95QE, while less expensive, also offers excellent gaming performance but similar to the Acer, it isn’t optimal for productivity. Both monitors have OLED technology which delivers infinite contrast and superb HDR experience, making them both suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption, with the LG slightly outshining in HDR peak brightness. For digital photo editing, both are comparable with full sRGB coverage, but the Acer slightly leads in wider color gamut coverage, an advantage if precise color work is important for you. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
27GS95QE
9.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.5 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
27GS95QE
$900
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $900.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
27GS95QE
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
27GS95QE
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
27GS95QE
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
27GS95QE
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
27GS95QE
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$900
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits196 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nits636 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms0.5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/109.8/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.7/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo