A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If competitive gaming is a priority and you want to save money, the Acer X27U offers a higher refresh rate and better response times. However, if you’re looking for higher screen resolution for tasks like digital photo editing or you prioritize image clarity over gaming performance, the LG 27EP950 might be worth the extra cost, even though it has a lower refresh rate and is not designed for HDR gaming. Neither of these OLED monitors is ideal for productivity given the risk of static image retention, and both offer similar color accuracy for media consumption. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
27EP950
5.4
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
27EP950
6.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
27EP950
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
27EP950
9.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
27EP950
7.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
27EP950
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
27EP950
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
27EP950
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$3,000
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
21
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo