A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




U2723QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and want the best visual experience with deep blacks and a high refresh rate, the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is a better choice, despite its high price. However, if you need a monitor better suited for productivity with higher resolution and are on a tighter budget, the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) would be a more cost-effective option, though it's not ideal for high-frame-rate gaming or the best HDR experience. Both are suitable for casual gaming and media consumption, but the Acer excels in gaming performance while the Dell offers more screen real estate and sharper text for professional tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
U2723QE
6.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1978:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
341 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
415 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
97.3 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
U2723QE
4.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
20.7 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
341 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
U2723QE
8.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
162 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) is very good for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
U2723QE
7.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1978:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
341 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
415 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) are both good for media consumption, though the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
U2723QE
$580
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) costs $580.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
U2723QE
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
U2723QE
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
U2723QE
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
U2723QE
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the Dell U2723QE (IPS Black) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)Dell U2723QE (IPS Black)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)Dell U2723QE (IPS Black)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$580
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS Black
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11978:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits341 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nits415 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms20.7 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/106/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI162 PPI
Coating
MatteSemi-Gloss
Text Clarity Score
6.7/108/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
21
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo