If you prioritize competitive gaming and require a very high refresh rate, the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is a solid choice, offering premium performance in fast-paced games due to its quick response time. However, it won't shine as much for general productivity or media consumption. On the other hand, if you're looking for a wider screen for an immersive experience at a lower cost, the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is excellent for HDR gaming and media with its ultrawide format and higher HDR brightness. Its performance in competitive gaming is good, though not as exceptional as the X27U, and its broader aspect ratio might be less suited for some productivity tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class color volume
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.8/10
5.2/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$1,000
$700
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) costs $700.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.6/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.