A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Predator X45
Company ProductName Specs




34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen and high contrast for immersive gaming and editing experiences, the Acer Predator X45 could be worth the extra cost. However, if you want a similar quality but slightly smaller monitor that still offers excellent gaming performance and is better suited for consuming media like movies and videos, the LG 34GS95QE would save you some money while still meeting those needs. Both monitors have their strengths in color accuracy and HDR content, making them solid choices for creative work as well. Keep in mind, neither are optimal for competitive gaming due to the potential for ghosting with their OLED panels. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class brightness
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

4.0
Predator X45
34GS95QE
5.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.1
Predator X45
34GS95QE
7.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption, though the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,200
Predator X45
34GS95QE
$1,300
Product image
Product image

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

$2,000

The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,200 and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,300.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

Yes
Predator X45
34GS95QE
No
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
Predator X45
34GS95QE
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.4
Predator X45
34GS95QE
6.3
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
Predator X45
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,200
$1,300
Screen Size
45"34"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
UnknownUnknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.01 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo