A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Predator X45
Company ProductName Specs




27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a large, ultrawide screen for an immersive gaming or multitasking experience and don't mind spending more, the Acer Predator X45 is a strong option, although it may not be the best for sharp text or high brightness in well-lit rooms. On the other hand, the LG 27GS95QE, being more affordable, offers a smaller screen suitable for both gaming and general use, with higher peak brightness which may be beneficial for HDR content, but it's not as well-suited for editing HDR videos due to its lower color gamut coverage. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class brightness
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.4
Predator X45
27GS95QE
9.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.5 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

4.0
Predator X45
27GS95QE
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.1
Predator X45
27GS95QE
7.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption, though the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,200
Predator X45
27GS95QE
$650
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,200 and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $650.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

Yes
Predator X45
27GS95QE
No
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
27GS95QE
No
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
Predator X45
27GS95QE
9.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
Predator X45
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Predator X45
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED) and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer Predator X45 (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,200
$650
Screen Size
45"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits196 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown636 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.01 ms0.5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.8/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.7/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo