If you're looking for affordability, the MSI Thin GF63 is generally less costly than the Razer Blade 18 and should serve well for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, the Razer Blade 18 offers superior performance suitable for more demanding applications, like 3D rendering or high-end gaming, but at a higher price. The MSI is more portable due to its lightweight design, which may benefit those who often carry their laptop around. On the other hand, the Razer Blade has a larger screen and possibly better build quality, enhancing the viewing experience and durability at the expense of increased weight and size. Your choice should depend on your primary needs: if budget and portability are key, go with the MSI, but if you need top performance for demanding tasks and a bigger display, and don't mind the additional cost, the Razer Blade 18 is the better option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI Thin GF63
Good portability
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Best in class speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
262.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
4.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.0 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
7.3/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.1/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for general use, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
PerfectRec’s General Use Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for general productivity, web browsing, streaming, video calls, and running a wide variety of apps and programs.
Gaming and AI
6.9/10
8.9/10
5.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
8.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI Thin GF63 is only fair.
The Razer Blade 18 offers an excellent gaming and 3D experience with its more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and a higher refresh rate of 240, providing smoother visuals compared to the MSI Thin GF63, which has a capable Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU and a refresh rate of 144 for very good performance. Additionally, the Razer's screen is larger with higher resolution, enhancing the overall screen quality, whereas the MSI offers a solid yet less powerful CPU and quality display for somewhat important factors affecting gaming performance.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
9.3/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
5.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for engineering and design, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
The Razer Blade 18 outperforms the MSI Thin GF63 for engineering and design work due to its more powerful CPU and double the RAM, offering superior multitasking and computational capabilities, alongside a GPU that's better suited for demanding design software. Additionally, the Razer Blade 18 has a higher quality display, with greater resolution and brightness, which provides clearer and more detailed visuals, crucial for engineering precision; however, it's heavier and slightly less portable than the MSI Thin GF63, and it might also produce more operating noise.
Content Creation
7.4/10
8.6/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for content creation, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.2/10
8.5/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for software development, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
8.9/10
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
262.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
The Razer Blade 18 has a better screen than the MSI Thin GF63 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
When considering screen quality for general use, the Razer Blade 18's panel type, resolution, and brightness outshine the MSI Thin GF63, making for clearer and more vibrant visuals. For engineering and design tasks, the Razer Blade 18 again stands out with superior color accuracy and range, crucial for precise and professional work. However, for gaming and 3D applications requiring fast motion rendering, both laptops fall short due to their lower refresh rates, despite their differences in resolution and panel type.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
4.1 lbs
WEIGHT
6.6 lbs
0.8in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The MSI Thin GF63 has good portability, while the Razer Blade 18 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.5/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 18 has very good build quality, while the MSI Thin GF63 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,150
$10
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The MSI Thin GF63 has a price of $1,150 and the Razer Blade 18 costs $10.
"The MSI GF63 Thin 11SC can be an admirable value for gamers and power users on a minimal budget. For just $599 as reviewed in its base model, its Intel Core i5 H-class processor and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 graphics perform much better than low-wattage CPUs and integrated graphics. That said, this is a light-class gaming laptop. Low scores in our demanding gaming benchmarks indicate using lower visual-quality settings will be required for playable performance."
"Razer made a powerful laptop in the Blade 18, showing off a beautiful and fast display and the same high-quality build we’ve come to expect from this product line. It’s also quite expensive, which is hardly a surprise, but bears repeating even in this price range. It’s pricier than the Scar 18 despite an inferior GPU and half the storage, so you really have to want the Blade 18’s design to justify the cost."
Get a great deal on the MSI Thin GF63 or the Razer Blade 18
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
123,795
Recommendations made
26,823
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.