When choosing between the MSI Thin GF63 and the Razer Blade 15, consider that the Razer offers higher performance with better hardware suitable for demanding applications, like 3D, machine learning, and gaming, at the cost of being more expensive. The MSI is more budget-friendly and still provides decent performance for general use and some engineering tasks, but won’t match the Razer’s capability for intensive tasks. The Razer also features a higher resolution and refresh rate display which provides a sharper and smoother visual experience, especially noticeable in gaming and high-definition video content. It has a larger battery capacity, which can mean longer use away from a power outlet, while the MSI has lower battery life. The MSI is slightly heavier than the Razer, so if portability is a concern, the Razer has an edge. Both laptops have similar screen sizes, but if the price is a major factor, the MSI offers a more cost-effective solution for less demanding computing needs. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI Thin GF63
The MSI Thin GF63 has no clear advantages over the Razer Blade 15.
Advantages of the Razer Blade 15
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Very good speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
7.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
262.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
271.0 nits
4.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
5.0 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
7.3/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.7/10
The Razer Blade 15 and MSI Thin GF63 are both good for general use, though the Razer Blade 15 is somewhat better.
The MSI Thin GF63 boasts a quality CPU and a substantial amount of RAM for smooth multitasking, paired with a decent screen and is relatively light for portability; however, it has a shorter battery life, making it less suitable for prolonged use away from power outlets.
Gaming and AI
6.9/10
8.0/10
5.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
8.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The Razer Blade 15 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI Thin GF63 is only fair.
The Razer Blade 15 offers a more powerful graphics unit with the Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti and a higher screen refresh rate, which translates to smoother visuals, making it very good for gaming and 3D tasks. On the other hand, the MSI Thin GF63 comes with an Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU and a lower screen refresh rate, but it still delivers good performance for gaming and 3D applications.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
8.5/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
5.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.0/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Razer Blade 15 is very good for engineering and design, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
The Razer Blade 15 outperforms the MSI Thin GF63 for engineering and design tasks due to a superior CPU, GPU, and higher resolution screen, which translates to more power for computation-intensive applications and better visual detail. While both have the same amount of RAM, the Razer’s more advanced GPU and better screen quality contribute to smoother graphics rendering and color accuracy, making it more suitable for demanding design work; however, its higher capabilities come at the expense of higher cost and slightly less portability compared to the MSI.
Content Creation
7.4/10
8.0/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 15 is very good for content creation, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.2/10
7.7/10
8.7/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 15 and MSI Thin GF63 are both good for software development, though the Razer Blade 15 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
8.2/10
15.6in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
262.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
271.0 nits
The Razer Blade 15 has a better screen than the MSI Thin GF63 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
When considering general use, the Razer Blade 15's display stands out due to its higher resolution and brightness, providing a clearer and more vibrant image. For engineering and design, the Razer's better coverage of color gamuts like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB ensures more accurate color reproduction, which is critical for these tasks. However, for gaming and 3D applications, both laptops offer less optimal experiences due to lower refresh rates, which are crucial for smooth motion rendering.
Build Quality
6.5/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 15 has very good build quality, while the MSI Thin GF63 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,150
$2,500
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
The MSI Thin GF63 has a price of $1,150 and the Razer Blade 15 costs $2,500.
"The MSI GF63 Thin 11SC can be an admirable value for gamers and power users on a minimal budget. For just $599 as reviewed in its base model, its Intel Core i5 H-class processor and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 graphics perform much better than low-wattage CPUs and integrated graphics. That said, this is a light-class gaming laptop. Low scores in our demanding gaming benchmarks indicate using lower visual-quality settings will be required for playable performance."
"The 2022 Blade 15 offers roughly 15 to 25 percent faster graphics performance and 20 percent faster CPU performance over last year's Core i7-11800H and RTX 3080 model. Thankfully, the system doesn't need to run noticeably louder or warmer to achieve faster results, but both power consumption and battery life take a hit. The higher consumption in particular appears to be a trend amongst many 12th gen Core laptops including the Schenker Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P or MSI Vector GP66 when compared to their previous generation counterparts. We're also glad to not see below-average CPU performance which was the case for the 10th gen Core i7-10875H model."
Get a great deal on the MSI Thin GF63 or the Razer Blade 15
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
112,095
Recommendations made
24,288
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.