If performance for engineering tasks, 3D rendering, or machine learning is crucial for you, and you are willing to invest more, the Razer Blade 18 is designed for high-end usage with its more powerful processor and graphics card. On the other hand, the MSI GF65 Thin is significantly less expensive and supports intensive gaming, but with less power compared to the Razer. With its lighter weight, the MSI offers better portability. The Razer does have a larger, higher-resolution screen, which is an important factor if screen space and clarity are priorities for you. However, keep in mind the Razer Blade 18 generally has a shorter battery life and is heavier, making it less ideal if you need to carry your laptop around frequently. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI GF65 Thin
Good portability
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Best in class speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
6.5/10
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
262.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
4.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.0 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
7.3/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.1/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for general use, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Razer Blade 18 outperforms the MSI GF65 Thin due to its more robust CPU, larger RAM capacity, higher resolution and better screen quality, and significantly superior speaker quality, albeit with a compromise in portability due to a heavier build and larger screen size. While both have similar battery lives suitable for general use, the Razer Blade offers considerably better performance for demanding tasks and multimedia experiences, whereas the MSI GF65 Thin, with lower specs, may not handle intense multitasking or high-resolution content as effectively but is easier to carry around.
Gaming and AI
6.8/10
8.9/10
6.1/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
6.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Razer Blade 18 offers superior gaming and 3D performance with its more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 graphics card and a higher screen refresh rate of 240 Hz, compared to the MSI GF65 Thin's Nvidia RTX 3060 and 144 Hz refresh rate. Furthermore, the Razer Blade 18 features a larger and higher resolution display which enhances screen quality, but these attributes also contribute to a heavier and potentially less portable device compared to the MSI model.
Engineering and Design
6.7/10
9.3/10
4.6/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
6.1/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
8.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for engineering and design, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The MSI GF65 Thin, with a mid-range CPU and GPU, standard RAM, and a full HD screen, is suitable for engineering and design tasks that are not too demanding. On the other hand, the Razer Blade 18 caters to more intensive requirements with a high-end CPU, superior GPU, ample RAM, and a higher resolution display, which translates to excellent performance in engineering and design applications.
Content Creation
6.8/10
8.6/10
4.6/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
8.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for content creation, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
6.3/10
8.5/10
4.6/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
8.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for software development, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
8.9/10
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
262.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
The Razer Blade 18 has a better screen than the MSI GF65 Thin for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, the Razer Blade 18's superior panel type, higher resolution, and brightness contribute to a more vibrant and clear display compared to the MSI GF65 Thin. In engineering and design, the Razer Blade 18's wider color gamuts ensure more precise color representation, which is critical for detailed work. However, for gaming and 3D, both laptops fall short due to their lower refresh rates, even though resolution and panel type are acceptable; a higher refresh rate is crucial for the smooth rendering of fast-paced visuals.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
4.1 lbs
WEIGHT
6.6 lbs
0.8in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The MSI GF65 Thin has good portability, while the Razer Blade 18 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.7/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 18 has very good build quality, while the MSI GF65 Thin has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,100
$10
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The MSI GF65 Thin has a price of $1,100 and the Razer Blade 18 costs $10.
"The MSI GF65 Thin offers a GeForce RTX 3060 on a budget. The MSI GF65 is a relatively inexpensive RTX 3060 laptop and, perhaps not coincidentally, it also comes with a slower-than-average RTX 3060 GPU. Other laptops we've tested thus far with the same GPU are about 10 to 15 percent faster. CPU performance is also slightly slower than average unless if users decide to enable Cooler Boost mode. Colors, black-white response times, Thunderbolt, and DisplayPort are either average or completely omitted. Gamers who want to maximize performance-per-dollar without sacrificing RAM or SSD upgradeability will find the lightweight MSI GF65 attractive."
"Razer made a powerful laptop in the Blade 18, showing off a beautiful and fast display and the same high-quality build we’ve come to expect from this product line. It’s also quite expensive, which is hardly a surprise, but bears repeating even in this price range. It’s pricier than the Scar 18 despite an inferior GPU and half the storage, so you really have to want the Blade 18’s design to justify the cost."
Get a great deal on the MSI GF65 Thin or the Razer Blade 18
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
124,395
Recommendations made
26,953
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.