If portability and battery life are essential for you, and you mainly use your laptop for general tasks, the LG Gram 16 is suitable as it's lighter and has longer battery life. However, if you demand top performance for 3D rendering, machine learning, or gaming, and can manage with a shorter battery life and heavier device, the Razer Blade 18 excels thanks to its more powerful hardware. Keep in mind, the Razer Blade 18's higher cost reflects its superior performance and additional features like a better webcam and speakers, which might be beneficial if these aspects are important for your activities. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG Gram 16
Very good portability
Excellent battery life
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Best in class speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.8/10
8.5/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
347.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
15.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.0 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
8.5/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.1/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for general use, while the LG Gram 16 is good.
The Razer Blade 18 outperforms the LG Gram 16 for general use due to its superior CPU and double the RAM, which enable smoother multitasking and faster performance. While the LG Gram 16 offers greater portability through lighter weight and longer battery life, its screen and speaker quality, though good, are not as exceptional as those on the Razer Blade 18, which boasts best-in-class audio-visuals but at a higher weight that impacts portability.
Gaming and AI
6.4/10
8.9/10
3.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
10.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for gaming and AI, while the LG Gram 16 is only fair.
The Razer Blade 18, with its Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and high screen refresh rate of 240, provides a superior gaming and 3D experience, supporting the latest graphical features like hardware ray tracing and DLSS, which are coveted in gaming laptops. On the other hand, the LG Gram 16's more modest Intel Iris Xe graphics and a lower screen refresh rate of 60, while still capable, cater more to everyday use and portability, offering a silent, fanless operation but lacking the high-performance gaming capabilities of the Razer Blade 18.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
9.3/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
3.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for engineering and design, while the LG Gram 16 is good.
The LG Gram 16, while lightweight and highly portable, has less powerful CPU and GPU than the Razer Blade 18, making the latter more suitable for demanding engineering and design tasks; however, the LG Gram's screen offers slightly higher pixel density for sharper images, though the Razer Blade 18 compensates with significantly better screen brightness and a much higher refresh rate, enhancing visual fluidity and detail.
Content Creation
7.8/10
8.6/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for content creation, while the LG Gram 16 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.9/10
8.5/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for software development, while the LG Gram 16 is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
8.9/10
16.0in
SIZE
18.0in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
347.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
The Razer Blade 18 has a better screen than the LG Gram 16 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The LG Gram 16, while boasting a high-resolution display and ample brightness that enhance its appeal for general office tasks or media consumption, may fall short in gaming and 3D applications due to a lower refresh rate, making fast-paced visuals less smooth. The Razer Blade 18 ups the ante with similar high resolution and brightness but gains an edge in engineering and design tasks with a wider color gamut, ensuring more accurate color representation which is critical for professional creative work. However, despite its premium display qualities, it too does not cater specifically to gaming or 3D interests because of a refresh rate that isn't designed to handle the demands of high-speed gaming visuals.
Battery
15.0 Hours
4.0 Hours
The LG Gram 16 has 15 hours of battery life. The Razer Blade 18 has 4 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Fair
16.0in
SIZE
18.0in
2.6 lbs
WEIGHT
6.6 lbs
0.6in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The LG Gram 16 has very good portability, while the Razer Blade 18 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.0/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 18 has very good build quality, while the LG Gram 16 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,450
$10
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The LG Gram 16 has a price of $1,450 and the Razer Blade 18 costs $10.
"The LG Gram 16 is a lightweight device with stability issues. The LG Gram 16Z90Q with a Core i7-1260P is made with portability in mind and places less of a focus on users with high demands on performance. The compact and light chassis is particularly practical when you are on the go. The device is not only comfortably small and lightweight, it also boasts a great battery life. When connected to mains, on the other hand, the 16-inch device is rather disappointing. The standard cooling mode causes extreme volatility in terms of CPU, SSD and iGPU performance. The meager stability of the chassis may also put off some potential buyers."
"Razer made a powerful laptop in the Blade 18, showing off a beautiful and fast display and the same high-quality build we’ve come to expect from this product line. It’s also quite expensive, which is hardly a surprise, but bears repeating even in this price range. It’s pricier than the Scar 18 despite an inferior GPU and half the storage, so you really have to want the Blade 18’s design to justify the cost."
Get a great deal on the LG Gram 16 or the Razer Blade 18
About LG
LG is a South Korean conglomerate company. While LG is mainly known for various products outside of technology, LG also develops laptops. Within the laptop industry, they are known for their thin-and-light Gram series, as well as their value-oriented Ultra series. LG laptops offer very thin and light laptops with phenomenal battery life, and are often on sale.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
125,595
Recommendations made
27,213
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.