HP Envy x360 15" vs MSI Cyborg 15

The HP Envy x360 15" is only fair for gaming and 3D tasks due to its integrated GPU, which is less powerful compared to discrete GPUs, and a screen refresh rate of 60Hz which might not be as smooth for fast-paced games. On the other hand, the MSI Cyborg 15 is considered good for these tasks as it features a more powerful Nvidia discrete GPU and a higher screen refresh rate of 144Hz, providing better performance and smoother visuals in demanding applications and games.

The HP Envy x360 15 has a less capable AMD Ryzen 5 CPU and integrated graphics, which are sufficient for basic engineering tasks but may struggle with more demanding applications, while its better screen quality suits design work. In contrast, the MSI Cyborg 15 offers a more powerful Intel i7 CPU and dedicated Nvidia RTX GPU, providing enhanced performance for engineering software and 3D design, although its screen quality is slightly inferior compared to the HP model.

In regards to general use, both the HP Envy x360 and the MSI Cyborg 15 offer screens that are just adequate; they likely have acceptable resolution and brightness, but may not stand out in terms of color accuracy or exceptional clarity. For engineering and design purposes, neither laptop excels in screen quality due to limited color gamut coverage, implying that professionals requiring precise color representation for their work may find these displays lacking. When it comes to gaming and 3D applications, their screens fall short primarily because of their lower refresh rates, which can hinder the smooth rendering of fast-paced visuals, although they may still offer reasonable resolution and panel quality for less demanding tasks.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The HP Envy x360 boasts a versatile 2-in-1 design suitable for a variety of tasks and enjoys a longer battery life for extended use without charging, while the MSI Cyborg 15, featuring a more potent CPU and GPU, is designed for powerful performance that can handle more demanding applications, albeit with slightly shorter battery life. While the Envy focuses on adaptability and comfort with its touchscreen and commendable battery life, the Cyborg 15 gears towards users needing higher computing power and storage capacity, with trade-offs in battery life and a traditional laptop form factor.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.