Dell Latitude 14 7490 vs MSI Modern 14

If you value sharp and vivid displays for tasks like word processing and web browsing, the Dell Latitude 14 7490's higher resolution and brightness may be more appealing, but when it comes to engineering and design, its superior color coverage will ensure more accurate color representation which is crucial for those fields. However, for gaming and 3D applications where the fluidity of motion is key, the MSI Modern 14 may not offer the high refresh rate desired for a smooth experience, and while the resolution and panel type contribute to image quality, they can't compensate for a lower refresh rate. Both laptops may not provide the optimal gaming experience, but for general productivity and professional creative work, the Dell has a clear advantage due to its display characteristics.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The Dell Latitude 14 7490, with a strong CPU and ample RAM, is reliable for general tasks; its higher battery capacity and solid build quality support long-lasting performance and durability. The MSI Modern 14, also equipped with ample RAM and a capable CPU for routine tasks, offers a lighter build and a quieter usage experience, which might appeal to users prioritizing comfort and portability over extended unplugged use.

The Dell Latitude 14 7490 and MSI Modern 14 have GPUs that are adequate for light gaming and 3D tasks, with the Dell having an Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the MSI equipped with AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Vega 7 integrated graphics. However, neither is optimal for high-end gaming or professional 3D work as both feature standard screen refresh rates of 60Hz, which is lower than the higher refresh rates preferred in those applications.

The Dell Latitude 14 7490's older Intel i7 processor with integrated graphics and MSI Modern 14's AMD Ryzen 5 with Vega graphics might not handle the most demanding engineering applications as smoothly as high-end dedicated GPUs, but they still perform adequately for lighter or moderate workloads. Both have decent screen quality with a standard full HD resolution and IPS panels, making them suitable for design tasks; however, the Dell's slightly better color space coverage could be a small advantage for color-sensitive work, while the MSI's stronger contrast ratio might offer crisper visuals, though the difference might not be very noticeable in practical use. Both laptops are fairly portable and offer good keyboards, but neither are standout choices for those seeking the ultimate in display fidelity or computational power for intensive engineering tasks.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.