Dell Inspiron 15 3525 vs XPG Xenia 14

The Dell Inspiron 15 3525 offers acceptable clarity and brightness for everyday tasks but lacks the resolution needed for fine detail in engineering applications and the color range that designers often require; additionally, its refresh rate is not high enough to support the smooth visuals critical for gaming. The XPG Xenia 14 provides strong visual performance with higher resolution and a wider color gamut for more accurate design work, although like the Dell, its screen's refresh rate isn't optimal for the fast-paced action in gaming and 3D rendering. Both are less suitable for 3D and gaming due to the emphasis on color accuracy and resolution over the higher refresh rates that these uses demand.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The Dell Inspiron 15 3525 has lower screen quality, lesser RAM, and shorter battery life compared to the XPG Xenia 14, which makes the latter more suitable for general use. Additionally, the XPG Xenia 14 offers greater portability and superior CPU performance, enhancing its usability for everyday tasks.

The Dell Inspiron 15 3525 has a moderate GPU that allows for acceptable gaming and 3D performance, although the screen refresh rate may limit the smoothness of fast-paced visuals. The XPG Xenia 14, while also equipped with a decent GPU for gaming, benefits from a better screen refresh rate, enhancing the fluidity of motion, but its smaller screen may be less immersive than the Dell's.

The XPG Xenia 14 outperforms the Dell Inspiron 15 3525 for engineering and design due to its superior CPU, double the RAM, and a higher-resolution screen with better color coverage, making it better suited for CPU-intensive tasks and detailed visual work. While the Dell provides adequate performance with its AMD Ryzen CPU and integrated graphics, its lower RAM and screen quality make it less optimal for demanding engineering software and design applications, even though it may offer a larger screen and slightly better portability.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.