ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 vs Gigabyte Aorus 15

The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 offers a balance of lightweight portability and solid performance suitable for general usage with its efficient CPU, sufficient RAM, and high-quality OLED screen, but it may fall short in multitasking and intensive tasks due to lower RAM compared to the Gigabyte Aorus 15, which excels with a more powerful CPU, double the RAM, and a dedicated high-end GPU, though at the cost of heavier weight and reduced battery life, making it less portable but better for demanding applications and gaming. Both laptops have substantial storage, quality keyboards, speakers, and manage heat and operating noise well, but if top-notch screen quality, lighter travel, and longer unplugging times are priorities, the ASUS might be more appealing, whereas the Gigabyte is the go-to for users requiring higher performance and who are okay with a bulkier build and more frequent charging.

The Gigabyte Aorus 15 outshines the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 in gaming and 3D capabilities largely because it boasts a significantly more powerful Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti graphics card, which can handle intensive graphics tasks much better than the integrated graphics on the ASUS.

The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 offers a high-quality OLED screen with excellent color coverage, making it suitable for design work, but its less powerful CPU and integrated GPU may limit performance for some engineering applications. The Gigabyte Aorus 15, with its more powerful CPU, dedicated high-end GPU, and ample RAM, is better equipped for demanding engineering software, at the expense of being heavier and having a lower screen color accuracy.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

For general use, the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 and Gigabyte Aorus 15 offer high resolutions and brightness, making text sharp and videos vibrant, but the Vivobook's superior panel type provides better viewing angles and color reproduction. Engineers and designers would appreciate both laptops for their wide color gamuts, covering an extensive range of colors needed for precise work, but the Vivobook might stand out if it offers better coverage of DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB. Gamers, however, would find both lacking due to their lower refresh rates, which can limit the smoothness of fast-paced action despite their acceptable resolution and panel quality.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.