The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is a budget-friendly option suited for basic tasks with moderate storage and performance, while the MSI GF63 Thin provides better performance for heavier workloads such as 3D rendering, machine learning, and engineering. The Vivobook Go has a longer battery life and a lighter build for portability, but its TN panel display offers lower quality visuals compared to the GF63 Thin's IPS display. If you need higher performance and quality graphics for gaming or complex tasks, the GF63 Thin is your choice, despite being heavier and having a shorter battery life. If affordability and portability for everyday use are your primary concerns, the Vivobook Go 15 would be appropriate. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook Go 15
Good overall build quality
Good battery life
Advantages of the MSI GF63 Thin
Good keyboard
Key differences
Engineering and Design
5.4/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The MSI GF63 Thin is only fair for engineering and design, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is poor.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has a less powerful Celeron processor and integrated graphics which are insufficient for demanding engineering and design software, whereas the MSI GF63 Thin offers a more capable i5 processor and dedicated Nvidia graphics, providing better performance for such tasks. Additionally, the MSI has a higher quality IPS screen and more RAM, which are crucial for detailed work, though it is slightly heavier, which may affect portability compared to the ASUS model.
Screen Quality
5.2/10
6.1/10
15.6in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
TN
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
200.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
249.0 nits
The MSI GF63 Thin has a better screen than the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, a laptop with higher resolution, better panel type, and greater brightness will provide a more comfortable and clearer viewing experience, which is why the MSI GF63 Thin's fair screen quality surpasses the ASUS Vivobook Go 15's poor screen. When it comes to engineering and design work, accurate color representation is crucial, resulting in the MSI having the edge with its fair screen that better covers color gamuts. Meanwhile, in gaming and 3D applications where the action is fast-paced, a higher refresh rate is key to a smooth experience which neither laptop excels at, but the resolution and panel quality being moderately important still leave the MSI GF63 Thin ahead.
Battery
7.0 Hours
4.2 Hours
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has 7 hours of battery life. The MSI GF63 Thin has 4.3 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Good
15.6in
SIZE
15.6in
3.4 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 and MSI GF63 Thin both have good portability, though the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has somewhat better portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$240
$599
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has a price of $240 and the MSI GF63 Thin costs $599.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for general use, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is poor.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has lower processing power and memory, which are crucial for seamless general use, with a basic screen and a lesser quality TN panel, resulting in less vibrant colors and narrower viewing angles compared to the MSI GF63 Thin, which offers better CPU and graphics performance, more RAM for multitasking, and a higher quality IPS display for better screen colors. Additionally, the Vivobook Go 15's low storage capacity and non-backlit keyboard might be a drawback for some users, while the GF63 Thin provides more storage and a backlit keyboard, enhancing usability in various lighting conditions.
Gaming and AI
5.5/10
6.0/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for gaming and AI, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is poor.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 15, with an Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU and a standard 60Hz screen refresh rate, is not as well-suited for gaming and 3D applications as the MSI GF63 Thin, which features a more powerful Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU capable of handling more graphically intensive tasks and a screen with better color contrast, despite both having the same screen refresh rate.
Content Creation
5.7/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
TN
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for content creation, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
5.9/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
6.7/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for software development, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
7.0/10
6.5/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS Vivobook Go 15 to have good build quality, while the MSI GF63 Thin has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 and the MSI GF63 Thin compare to other laptops
"The Asus Vivobook Go 15 is a good option if you’re looking for one device to tackle a bunch of smaller problems. For simple school studies, portable evening entertainment or distractions, and getting household admin or light office workloads out of the way, it’s a great little package with respectable battery life, and a great contender for the advent of cloud gaming."
"If you leave aside the meagre port selection (no card reader, no DisplayPort, no Thunderbolt 3 or USB 3.1 Gen2), the fan control that could be improved (idle mode!) and the relatively dark and slow display, the MSI GF63 Thin 9SC does not have any major weaknesses. The 15-inch gamer is compact, has a low weight and offers a good price-to-performance ratio, which should please gamers that are looking for both a portable and an affordable gaming notebook. Input devices, battery life, case quality and performance are all appropriate for this purchase price."
Get a great deal on the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 or the MSI GF63 Thin
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
99,495
Recommendations made
21,558
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.