The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is a budget-friendly option that offers good portability and sufficient performance for general use. It has a decent battery life, a lightweight design, and a full HD IPS display, though it may fall short for intensive gaming or engineering tasks. On the other hand, the MSI GF63 Thin is more expensive but provides better performance, particularly for gaming, 3D rendering and engineering, due to its more powerful Intel processor and dedicated Nvidia graphics. It is slightly heavier and has a less effective battery life, making it less portable than the ASUS. If you prioritize performance over portability and can invest more, the MSI GF63 Thin is the preferable choice; for everyday tasks and greater mobility, the ASUS Vivobook might be the better option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook Go 14
Very good portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the MSI GF63 Thin
Good keyboard
Key differences
Content Creation
6.5/10
6.0/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and MSI GF63 Thin are both only fair for content creation, though the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Screen Quality
6.2/10
6.1/10
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
250.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
249.0 nits
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has a better screen than the MSI GF63 Thin for software development, and content creation.
For general use, the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and MSI GF63 Thin offer adequate resolution and brightness but may not provide the top-tier visual clarity and vibrance found in higher-end models, making them serviceable but not exceptional. In engineering and design, these laptops' coverage of professional color gamuts may fall short of what's needed for the most color-critical work, which could be a concern for users engaged in tasks that demand high color accuracy. For 3D and gaming, the lower refresh rates on these laptops could lead to less fluid motion and responsiveness, which may disappoint gamers or professionals working with fast-paced visuals.
Battery
7.0 Hours
4.2 Hours
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has 7 hours of battery life. The MSI GF63 Thin has 4.3 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
3.0 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has very good portability, while the MSI GF63 Thin has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$450
$599
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has a price of $450 and the MSI GF63 Thin costs $599.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and MSI GF63 Thin are both only fair for general use.
PerfectRec’s General Use Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for general productivity, web browsing, streaming, video calls, and running a wide variety of apps and programs.
Gaming and AI
5.7/10
6.0/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
8.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for gaming and AI, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is poor.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14, with its less powerful AMD Radeon 610M graphics unit, is not well-suited for gaming and 3D applications, while the MSI GF63 Thin's Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics provide a fair experience in these tasks despite both having the same screen refresh rate. Additionally, while both laptops have comparable CPU performance and screen quality, the superior GPU in the MSI GF63 Thin gives it an edge for gaming and 3D performance.
Engineering and Design
5.9/10
6.0/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for engineering and design, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is poor.
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14, with its less powerful AMD Ryzen 3 CPU and Radeon 610M GPU, is deemed poor for engineering and design, where robust processing and graphics capabilities are very important, and doesn't fare as well in terms of screen quality. On the other hand, the MSI GF63 Thin's Intel i5 CPU and Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU make it fair for such tasks, with a better screen contrast ratio and better GPU supporting more demanding workflows, though both laptops offer comparable RAM and have IPS panels with similar screen resolutions and sizes.
Software Development
6.4/10
6.0/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
6.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and MSI GF63 Thin are both only fair for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
6.5/10
6.5/10
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and MSI GF63 Thin both have only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 and the MSI GF63 Thin compare to other laptops
"The lack of a backlit keyboard in this price segment shouldn't sway the buyer the other way. However, it still comes down to user preference. The Vivobook Go 14 is a decent laptop in an extremely competitive price segment. A few omissions are a part of the balancing to reach the price segment. The Asus Vivobook Go 14 is a rare find when it comes to the price to performance ratio."
"If you leave aside the meagre port selection (no card reader, no DisplayPort, no Thunderbolt 3 or USB 3.1 Gen2), the fan control that could be improved (idle mode!) and the relatively dark and slow display, the MSI GF63 Thin 9SC does not have any major weaknesses. The 15-inch gamer is compact, has a low weight and offers a good price-to-performance ratio, which should please gamers that are looking for both a portable and an affordable gaming notebook. Input devices, battery life, case quality and performance are all appropriate for this purchase price."
Get a great deal on the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 or the MSI GF63 Thin
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
99,495
Recommendations made
21,558
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.