If budget is your primary concern, the ASUS Vivobook 14 might be the right choice being significantly less expensive, while still providing satisfactory performance for general use and tasks like web browsing and productivity applications. However, the MSI Thin GF63, though more expensive, offers higher performance and better features which may be worth considering if you're into more intensive tasks like gaming, 3D rendering, or machine learning. The MSI has a bigger screen, better graphics, and a more powerful processor, which may also translate to reduced battery life and increased weight, making it less portable than the ASUS. If portability and battery life are crucial for you and your tasks aren't performance-heavy, leaning towards the ASUS makes sense. On the other hand, for high-end tasks and if portability isn't a top priority, the MSI could be a better fit despite the higher price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook 14
Good overall build quality
Very good portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the MSI Thin GF63
Good for general use
Good for engineering and design
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good keyboard
Key differences
General Use
6.9/10
7.4/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
250.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
7.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
6.7/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
8.5/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.3/10
The MSI Thin GF63 is good for general use, while the ASUS Vivobook 14 is only fair.
The MSI Thin GF63 outperforms the ASUS Vivobook 14 for general use mainly due to its higher capacity and faster CPU, double the RAM, and a more capable graphics processor, all of which contribute to smoother multitasking and better handling of more demanding applications. Meanwhile, the Vivobook 14 is lighter and boasts longer battery life, making it more portable, but this comes with tradeoffs in screen size and refresh rate, which are lower compared to the MSI.
Gaming and AI
6.0/10
6.9/10
3.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
The MSI Thin GF63 and ASUS Vivobook 14 are both only fair for gaming and AI, though the MSI Thin GF63 is somewhat better.
The ASUS Vivobook 14's gaming and 3D performance is less compared to the MSI Thin GF63 primarily because it uses an integrated GPU, which is generally less capable than the dedicated Nvidia RTX 4050 GPU found in the MSI Thin GF63. Additionally, the MSI Thin GF63 offers a higher screen refresh rate, which is beneficial for smoother visual performance in games and 3D applications.
Engineering and Design
6.3/10
7.5/10
6.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.7/10
3.6/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.6/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The MSI Thin GF63 is good for engineering and design, while the ASUS Vivobook 14 is only fair.
The ASUS Vivobook 14's less powerful CPU and GPU, along with lower RAM, make it merely fair for engineering and design, while the MSI Thin GF63, with a superior CPU, a dedicated GPU, and double the RAM, is better suited for such tasks. Despite being heavier and slightly bulkier, the MSI also has a high refresh rate screen which benefits design work, whereas the ASUS trades off some performance for better portability and lower operating noise.
Screen Quality
6.3/10
6.8/10
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
250.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
The MSI Thin GF63 has a better screen than the ASUS Vivobook 14 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, the ASUS Vivobook 14 and MSI Thin GF63 both offer displays that meet basic needs in terms of resolution and brightness, providing a clear and reasonably vibrant viewing experience suitable for tasks like browsing and document editing. In engineering and design contexts, where precise color representation is crucial, both models may fall short as they likely do not cover the wider color gamuts like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB needed for accurate color work. Gamers and professionals working in 3D spaces may find the refresh rates on these laptops insufficient for the smooth visuals required in fast-paced games or fluid modeling, despite having adequate resolution and panel type for the task.
Battery
7.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The ASUS Vivobook 14 has 7 hours of battery life. The MSI Thin GF63 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
3.0 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The ASUS Vivobook 14 has very good portability, while the MSI Thin GF63 has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$421
$1,400
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The ASUS Vivobook 14 has a price of $421 and the MSI Thin GF63 costs $1,400.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI Thin GF63 to be good for content creation, while the ASUS Vivobook 14 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
6.8/10
7.2/10
6.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.7/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
6.7/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI Thin GF63 to be good for software development, while the ASUS Vivobook 14 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
7.0/10
6.5/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS Vivobook 14 to have good build quality, while the MSI Thin GF63 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS Vivobook 14 and the MSI Thin GF63 compare to other laptops
"The MSI GF63 Thin 11SC can be an admirable value for gamers and power users on a minimal budget. For just $599 as reviewed in its base model, its Intel Core i5 H-class processor and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 graphics perform much better than low-wattage CPUs and integrated graphics. That said, this is a light-class gaming laptop. Low scores in our demanding gaming benchmarks indicate using lower visual-quality settings will be required for playable performance."
Get a great deal on the ASUS Vivobook 14 or the MSI Thin GF63
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
100,095
Recommendations made
21,688
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.