The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 tends to be less expensive than the Razer Blade 14 (2023) but offers a larger screen and higher battery capacity, which is beneficial for gaming and productivity, though this comes with a tradeoff in portability due to its larger size and heavier weight. On the other hand, the Razer Blade 14, with a sharper and brighter display, excels in portability, build quality, and a higher refresh rate, making it more suitable for on-the-go use and fast-paced games. Both have similar processors and graphics cards, making them capable for gaming, 3D rendering, and engineering tasks, but you'll experience better screen quality with the Razer. If battery life and a larger display are priorities, the ASUS may suit you best, while the Razer offers a more portable, high-quality build at a higher price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
Very good battery life
Advantages of the Razer Blade 14 (2023)
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Very good portability
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
Screen Quality
6.8/10
8.9/10
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
253.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
560.0 nits
The Razer Blade 14 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, and content creation.
If you prioritize a sharp image and vibrant display for everyday tasks and professional design work, the Razer Blade 14, with its high resolution and excellent color coverage, would outshine the ASUS TUF Gaming A17. However, for games and 3D applications where motion smoothness is crucial, neither laptop offers an optimal experience due to their lower refresh rates. For extended unplugged use and frequent travel, the lighter build and longer battery life of the Razer Blade 14 may appeal to you, despite its higher cost compared to the more affordable, yet bulkier and less energy-efficient ASUS TUF Gaming A17.
Battery
10.0 Hours
6.0 Hours
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has 10 hours of battery life. The Razer Blade 14 has 6 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Very Good
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
5.7 lbs
WEIGHT
4.0 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) has very good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.2/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) has very good build quality, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,552
$2,400
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has a price of $1,552 and the Razer Blade 14 (2023) costs $2,400.
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for general use.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has a larger screen and a number pad on the keyboard, making it advantageous for productivity tasks, while its bulkier size and heavier weight affect its portability. The Razer Blade 14, on the other hand, offers a higher resolution display and a significantly more portable design but has a shorter battery life under typical usage. Both are equipped with powerful CPUs and sufficient RAM to handle general use effectively.
Gaming and AI
8.1/10
8.4/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
6.5/10
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for gaming and AI.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 boasts a powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and a comfortable 144Hz screen refresh rate providing smooth gameplay, whereas the Razer Blade 14 (2023) offers a slightly less powerful Nvidia RTX 4060 GPU but compensates with a superior 240Hz refresh rate for ultra-smooth visuals.
Engineering and Design
8.3/10
8.7/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for engineering and design.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17's larger screen and high-performing components like the AMD Ryzen 9 CPU, Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, and considerable RAM make it well-suited for demanding engineering tasks, though its size and weight limit its portability. Conversely, the Razer Blade 14 (2023) offers similar CPU and ample RAM with a superior screen resolution and higher color accuracy, packed in a more portable and quieter design, making it ideal for engineering professionals who value mobility and screen quality alongside performance.
Content Creation
8.1/10
8.2/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.7/10
7.9/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 14 (2023) and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and the Razer Blade 14 (2023) compare to other laptops
"There is one big question that needs an answer. Is the TUF Gaming A17 FA707 a better purchase than the ROG Strix G17 G713R (2022)? Well, it depends. Undoubtedly, the Strix is the more premium product. Arguably the biggest advantage it has over its TUF fellow is in regards to the display. ASUS TUF Gaming A17 A707’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles, and a very good contrast ratio."
"After making a huge splash with the original 2021 model, it's expected that the 2022 refresh would be more of a minor update to an already impressive machine. It adds a higher resolution webcam (720p to 1080p), faster CPU (Ryzen 9 5900HX to Ryzen 9 6900HX), faster GPU (RTX 3070/3080 to 3070/3080 Ti), faster RAM (DDR4-3200 to DDR5-4800), faster M.2 SSD support (PCIe3 x4 to PCIe4 x4), newer WLAN module (Killer AX1690i to Qualcomm WCN685x), and a MUX switch for the new integrated Radeon 680M GPU. It's indubitably an upgrade especially in terms of single-thread processor performance."
Get a great deal on the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 or the Razer Blade 14 (2023)
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
100,395
Recommendations made
21,753
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.