Acer Swift X 16 vs ASUS Vivobook Go 15

The Acer Swift X 16 outshines the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 in general use due to a superior CPU and RAM configuration, which leads to faster and more efficient performance, paired with a higher quality IPS screen for better viewing angles and color accuracy. Additionally, the Swift X 16's larger, high-resolution display with better brightness and color coverage enhances user experience, whereas the Vivobook Go 15 is held back by more modest specs like a basic CPU, less RAM, a lower-quality TN panel, and reduced storage capacity, making it less ideal for demanding tasks and content viewing.

The Acer Swift X 16 is good for gaming and 3D due to its robust Nvidia RTX 3050 GPU and high screen refresh rate of 165, which provides smooth visuals and better overall performance for graphics-intensive tasks. In contrast, the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has a less powerful Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU and a standard screen refresh rate of 60, making it less suitable for demanding gaming and 3D applications where graphical fidelity and fluid motion are important.

The Acer Swift X 16 is well-equipped for engineering and design tasks due to its powerful AMD Ryzen processor, substantial RAM, and dedicated Nvidia graphics, coupled with a high-quality IPS screen that enhances visual work. On the other hand, the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 falls short for these tasks due to its basic Intel Celeron processor, minimal RAM, integrated graphics, and a lower-tier TN panel screen, which does not offer the same color accuracy or viewing angles.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

For general use, the Acer Swift X 16 offers a high-resolution display with good brightness and a better panel type, providing crisp and vibrant visuals, whereas the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 has a lower-quality display with reduced sharpness and dimness that might strain the eyes over time. When it comes to engineering and design, the Acer Swift X 16's display covers a wide range of color gamuts like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB, ensuring accurate color representation for professional work, while the Vivobook's screen likely falls short in color accuracy, affecting the fidelity of the work. As for gaming and 3D tasks, the Swift X's poor refresh rate might lead to less smooth motion and slower response times, detrimental for fast-paced games, even though it might have a decent resolution and panel type, and the Vivobook, while also having a poor refresh rate, compounds the issue with an overall lower quality display.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.