The Acer Swift X 16 is sleek, lightweight, and a tad less costly, ideal for carrying around and general use, with decent performance for engineering tasks; its battery life is shorter than the ASUS but sufficient for most day-to-day activities. On the flip side, the ASUS TUF Gaming A17, while slightly pricier and heavier, boasts superior graphics performance, catering well to 3D rendering, machine learning, and intensive gaming needs; its larger screen and longer battery life are great for extended use, although it's not as easy to lug around. If portability is key, go with the Acer; for gaming and intense graphical work, choose ASUS. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift X 16
Very good for software development
Very good overall display quality
Good portability
Very good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good battery life
Key differences
Gaming and AI
7.0/10
8.1/10
4.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Unknown
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
8.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Swift X 16 is good.
The Acer Swift X 16, with its Nvidia RTX 3050 GPU and higher screen refresh rate, is well-suited for gaming and 3D applications, though the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 surpasses it with a more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, despite a slightly lower refresh rate; the latter's superior GPU typically offers a significant edge in gaming and 3D intensive tasks. The CPUs and screen quality of both are impactful, but the top-notch GPU and refresh rates are decisive factors for a smooth and immersive experience.
Screen Quality
8.2/10
6.8/10
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
402.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
The Acer Swift X 16 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, and software development.
The Acer Swift X 16 likely has a higher resolution and brighter display which enhances its quality for general use and engineering, contributing to clearer images and more accurate color representation. This same display, however, does not prioritize high refresh rates, which are crucial for a smooth gaming experience and fast-paced 3D rendering. The ASUS TUF Gaming A17, with fair screen quality across the board, might not have the same level of brightness or resolution, resulting in less impressive general use and engineering experiences, and its lower refresh rate detracts from gaming and 3D tasks despite being a gaming-oriented machine.
Battery
8.0 Hours
10.0 Hours
The Acer Swift X 16 has 8 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has 10 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Fair
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
4.1 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Swift X 16 has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,250
$1,552
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Swift X 16 has a price of $1,250 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 costs $1,552.
The Acer Swift X 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for general use.
The Acer Swift X 16 has a high-resolution screen and a lighter build which is ideal for portability and day-to-day tasks, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 offers a more powerful CPU and GPU combination for better performance in demanding applications but is heavier and slightly bulkier, affecting its portability. Both laptops have quality screens, adequate RAM, and significant storage, but the Swift X prioritizes screen quality and portability, while the TUF Gaming prioritizes performance, which may come with a trade-off in battery life and portability.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
8.3/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
4.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and Acer Swift X 16 are both very good for engineering and design.
The Acer Swift X 16 is favored for engineering and design due to its high-resolution screen and efficient performance with a balanced CPU and GPU, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17's superior graphics card and larger screen are advantageous for graphics-intensive tasks, although it's less portable and has a lower screen quality in terms of color accuracy and resolution. Both laptops offer ample RAM and high-powered processors for demanding software, but the Acer emphasizes portability and screen quality, while the ASUS leans towards gaming capabilities and raw graphic performance.
Content Creation
8.3/10
8.1/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift X 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 are both very good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
8.0/10
7.7/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Acer Swift X 16 to be very good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
7.6/10
7.2/10
The Acer Swift X 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A17 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift X 16 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 compare to other laptops
"Acer’s Swift X 16 is an excellent choice for shoppers who want a 16-inch laptop and care more for performance than attractive design or long battery life. The Swift X 16’s gorgeous OLED display, spacious keyboard, and big touchpad make it pleasant to use in basic day-to-day tasks. It also has an AMD Ryzen 9 processor and Nvidia RTX 4050 graphics, which combine to deliver good performance in a wide variety of productivity applications and games. A few minor mistakes, like poorly-placed USB-C ports that lack DisplayPort, will turn off some shoppers, but those who can accept its shortcomings will find the Swift X 16 a versatile daily driver."
"There is one big question that needs an answer. Is the TUF Gaming A17 FA707 a better purchase than the ROG Strix G17 G713R (2022)? Well, it depends. Undoubtedly, the Strix is the more premium product. Arguably the biggest advantage it has over its TUF fellow is in regards to the display. ASUS TUF Gaming A17 A707’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles, and a very good contrast ratio."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift X 16 or the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
132,195
Recommendations made
28,643
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.