Acer Swift Go 14 vs ASUS Vivobook Go 15

The Acer Swift Go 14 outperforms the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 for general use because it comes with a more powerful CPU, more RAM, and a higher-quality screen, all of which contribute to better performance and visual experience. Additionally, the Swift Go 14's higher portability and longer battery life offer more flexibility for mobile use compared to the Vivobook Go 15, which falls short with its less powerful components and shorter battery life.

The Acer Swift Go 14 offers a superior gaming and 3D experience compared to the ASUS Vivobook Go 15 because it has a more capable GPU, the Iris Xe, which can handle these tasks better than the Vivobook's Intel UHD Graphics 600. Both laptops have the same screen refresh rate, but the Acer's GPU and better overall screen quality, including a higher resolution and IPS panel, give it a notable edge for these activities.

The Acer Swift Go 14 is better suited for engineering and design use due to its more powerful Intel i7 processor, higher RAM capacity, and superior Intel Iris Xe graphics, which enables smoother performance with intensive applications compared to the ASUS Vivobook Go 15, which has a lower-end Intel Celeron processor, less RAM, and basic Intel UHD 600 graphics, making it less capable for demanding tasks. Additionally, the Acer has a higher quality IPS screen with better color coverage and brightness, essential for design work, while the ASUS has a TN panel with lower color accuracy and brightness, detracting from detailed visual tasks.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

For general use, the Acer Swift Go 14 offers a display with higher resolution and brightness, making it more vibrant and easier to view in various lighting conditions, whereas the Asus Vivobook Go 15's lower resolution and brightness may result in less clarity and vibrancy. In engineering and design tasks, the Acer's display covers a wider range of colors with better Adobe RGB and DCI-P3 color gamuts, allowing more precise color work, while the Asus falls short in color accuracy, which can be critical for these types of tasks. When it comes to 3D applications, the Acer's lack of a high refresh rate limits the smoothness of motion which is essential for an optimal gaming experience, though the Asus also shares this limitation, meaning neither laptop is ideal for 3D work where motion quality is a priority.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.