The Acer Predator Triton 300 is more expensive but offers better performance, ideal for gaming and engineering tasks with a more powerful processor, higher RAM, and a better GPU. It also has a higher refresh rate screen for smoother visuals. Conversely, the MSI GF63 Thin is more affordable and lighter, making it more portable but with lower performance due to less RAM, a less powerful GPU and processor, and a lower refresh rate screen. The Predator Triton 300 has shorter battery life than the GF63 Thin; hence, it's less suitable for extended use without charging. Choose based on your balance between performance needs and budget. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 300
Good for general use
Good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good speakers
Advantages of the MSI GF63 Thin
The MSI GF63 Thin has no clear advantages over the Acer Predator Triton 300.
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
6.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
294.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
249.0 nits
5.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.2 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
7.4/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.3/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for general use, while the MSI GF63 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 surpasses the MSI GF63 Thin in general use mainly due to its more powerful main processor and greater RAM which contribute to faster and smoother performance, while also boasting a GPU that is better suited to graphics-intensive tasks. Although both laptops have similar screen quality and portability, the Acer has a higher battery life and overall build quality, which offers a more robust experience, compared to the MSI GF63 Thin which has lesser battery life and slightly lower build quality which affects its general use capability.
Gaming and AI
7.1/10
6.0/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for gaming and AI, while the MSI GF63 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 offers a high-refresh-rate screen and a powerful RTX 3060 GPU, making it better suited for smooth, visually intensive gaming and 3D applications, while the MSI GF63 Thin features a lower-refresh-rate display and a less powerful GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU, which are adequate for gaming but may not provide as immersive an experience. The Triton's superior screen refresh rate and GPU contribute significantly to its higher performance for gaming and 3D tasks compared to the MSI GF63 Thin, although both have quality IPS screens and capable CPUs.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
6.0/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for engineering and design, while the MSI GF63 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is better suited for engineering and design due to its superior main processor, more RAM, and more powerful GPU, which are very important for such tasks, along with a higher quality screen that displays more colors accurately. In contrast, the MSI GF63 Thin, while more portable and quieter, has a less powerful processor and GPU, and half the RAM and screen quality, making it less optimal for demanding engineering software and detailed design work.
Content Creation
7.3/10
6.0/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for content creation, while the MSI GF63 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
6.0/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for software development, while the MSI GF63 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
6.1/10
15.6in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
249.0 nits
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a better screen than the MSI GF63 Thin for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The Acer Predator Triton 300's screen boasts higher resolution and brightness, making it ideal for everyday tasks and detailed engineering work due to its sharp, vibrant display. However, its lower refresh rate holds it back for gaming and 3D applications, where fluid motion is crucial. The MSI GF63 Thin offers acceptable quality for both everyday and professional tasks with adequate resolution and brightness, but its screen performance falls short for gaming and 3D content due to a similarly limited refresh rate.
Battery
5.5 Hours
4.2 Hours
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has 5.5 hours of battery life. The MSI GF63 Thin has 4.3 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Build Quality
7.6/10
6.5/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has good build quality, while the MSI GF63 Thin has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,150
$599
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a price of $1,150 and the MSI GF63 Thin costs $599.
"In our particular review configuration, the Acer Predator Triton 300 turned out to be a fairly powerful gaming notebook. Both CPU and GPU performance were at a high level, and the aluminum case turned out to be fairly robust. Only the display lid could have been a bit more robust. For customers on a budget that do not mind tinkering with the device’s fan management the Acer Predator Triton 300 can be worth a closer look."
"If you leave aside the meagre port selection (no card reader, no DisplayPort, no Thunderbolt 3 or USB 3.1 Gen2), the fan control that could be improved (idle mode!) and the relatively dark and slow display, the MSI GF63 Thin 9SC does not have any major weaknesses. The 15-inch gamer is compact, has a low weight and offers a good price-to-performance ratio, which should please gamers that are looking for both a portable and an affordable gaming notebook. Input devices, battery life, case quality and performance are all appropriate for this purchase price."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Triton 300 or the MSI GF63 Thin
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,795
Recommendations made
24,223
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.