The Acer Predator Triton 300 offers a solid balance of price and capabilities with a high-quality display for general use, but it has less storage than the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and shorter battery life. The ASUS, on the other hand, provides greater storage capacity and has a larger screen, which could be beneficial if you often work on more demanding tasks such as 3D rendering or machine learning, and also if you prefer a longer battery life. While the ASUS can be more expensive, it may be the better option for intensive gaming and performance-heavy engineering work. However, be aware that it is heavier and less portable than the Acer, making it less ideal if you travel often or need to carry your laptop around regularly. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 300
Good overall display quality
Good portability
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Very good battery life
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
294.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
5.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
10.0 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
7.4/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for general use, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 stands out for general use with its higher-capacity storage and a better battery life, making it suitable for longer use without recharging, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is lighter and thus more portable but falls short in these aspects. Additionally, the ASUS presents a larger screen for greater visual comfort, but this factor also contributes to it being less portable and heavier than the Acer.
Gaming and AI
7.1/10
8.1/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 provides superior gaming and 3D performance primarily due to its higher-end Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, which outperforms the Acer Predator Triton 300's RTX 3060, paired with a screen that refreshes just as fast, making games look smoother. While both have the same screen refresh rate, which is important for gaming, the ASUS's more powerful graphics unit and the Acer's respectable but less powerful GPU explain their respective 'very good' and 'good' performance in gaming and 3D tasks.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
8.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 outperforms the Acer Predator Triton 300 because it boasts a more powerful CPU and GPU, which are critical for engineering and design tasks that demand high computational power and graphics processing. Additionally, it has a larger, higher quality screen, enhancing the visual work experience, although it is heavier and bigger, making it less portable compared to the Acer.
Content Creation
7.3/10
8.1/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
7.7/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for software development, though the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
6.8/10
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 for general use, gaming and AI, and engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has a better screen for content creation, and software development.
For general use, where clarity, text readability, and viewing comfort are crucial, the Acer Predator Triton 300 offers better resolution and brightness, making it more suitable for tasks like web browsing, document editing, and video streaming. When it comes to engineering and design work that requires precise color representation for tasks such as photo editing and CAD work, the same laptop provides a wider range of colors, meeting professional color gamut standards. However, for gaming and 3D applications where fast-paced visuals benefit from quick screen updates, the ASUS TUF Gaming A17, while still not ideal, may be slightly more responsive due to a moderately better refresh rate, despite both having limitations in this area.
Battery
5.5 Hours
10.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has 5.5 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has 10 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
4.4 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,150
$1,550
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a price of $1,150 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 costs $1,550.
"In our particular review configuration, the Acer Predator Triton 300 turned out to be a fairly powerful gaming notebook. Both CPU and GPU performance were at a high level, and the aluminum case turned out to be fairly robust. Only the display lid could have been a bit more robust. For customers on a budget that do not mind tinkering with the device’s fan management the Acer Predator Triton 300 can be worth a closer look."
"There is one big question that needs an answer. Is the TUF Gaming A17 FA707 a better purchase than the ROG Strix G17 G713R (2022)? Well, it depends. Undoubtedly, the Strix is the more premium product. Arguably the biggest advantage it has over its TUF fellow is in regards to the display. ASUS TUF Gaming A17 A707’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles, and a very good contrast ratio."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Triton 300 or the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,795
Recommendations made
24,223
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.