The Acer Predator Triton 300 is designed for high performance and gaming, with a powerful processor, dedicated graphics, and a higher refresh rate display. It is suitable for engineering, 3D rendering, and machine learning but is heavier and has a shorter battery life, making it less portable. The ASUS R410MA is more budget-friendly, significantly lighter, and has a longer battery life which makes it more portable. However, it has lower performance due to its basic processor and integrated graphics, making it suitable for general use but not for intensive tasks or gaming. Choose the Acer Predator Triton 300 for demanding applications or the ASUS R410MA for everyday tasks and greater mobility. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 300
Good for general use
Good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good speakers
Good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS R410MA
Very good portability
Good battery life
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
5.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
294.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
5.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
8.5 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
5.3/10
7.4/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
8.5/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for general use, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 offers robust performance with its higher-end CPU and more RAM, making it suitable for a variety of demanding tasks, whereas the ASUS R410MA's low-powered processor and minimal RAM limit its ability to handle more than basic computing needs. Additionally, the Acer's superior IPS display with higher resolution contributes to a better viewing experience compared to the ASUS's TN panel with lower resolution, justifying the Acer's suitability for general use despite being less portable and having shorter battery life than the ASUS.
Gaming and AI
7.1/10
5.4/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is equipped with a Nvidia RTX 3060 graphics card and a screen that refreshes 144 times per second, offering a rich gaming and 3D experience, while the ASUS R410MA has an Intel UHD Graphics 600 which is less powerful and a screen with a lower refresh rate of 60 times per second, making it less suitable for gaming and 3D tasks.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
5.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for engineering and design, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is equipped with a high-performance Intel i7 processor, an Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU, and substantial RAM, making it suitable for demanding engineering and design work, while also providing a quality IPS screen. In contrast, the ASUS R410MA has a basic Intel Celeron processor, integrated graphics, and less RAM which struggle with such tasks, plus its TN panel offers inferior screen quality, despite being more portable and having a quieter operating noise.
Content Creation
7.3/10
5.7/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for content creation, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
5.6/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
5.3/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is good for software development, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
5.1/10
15.6in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a better screen than the ASUS R410MA for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The Acer Predator Triton 300's screen likely offers higher resolution and greater brightness, making it suitable for everyday tasks and detailed engineering work; however, its refresh rate might be insufficient for the smooth visuals demanded by modern 3D gaming. The ASUS R410MA, with lower overall screen performance, including a less vibrant color range, may not offer the clarity and accuracy necessary for either general activities or professional design tasks, and with a standard refresh rate, wouldn't appeal to gamers. In both cases, professionals in engineering and design could be dissatisfied with the ASUS, while only general users might find the Acer's screen adequate, save for gaming enthusiasts.
Battery
5.5 Hours
8.5 Hours
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has 5.5 hours of battery life. The ASUS R410MA has 8.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Very Good
15.6in
SIZE
14.0in
4.4 lbs
WEIGHT
2.8 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The ASUS R410MA has very good portability, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.6/10
5.1/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has good build quality, while the ASUS R410MA has poor build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,150
$111
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a price of $1,150 and the ASUS R410MA costs $111.
"In our particular review configuration, the Acer Predator Triton 300 turned out to be a fairly powerful gaming notebook. Both CPU and GPU performance were at a high level, and the aluminum case turned out to be fairly robust. Only the display lid could have been a bit more robust. For customers on a budget that do not mind tinkering with the device’s fan management the Acer Predator Triton 300 can be worth a closer look."
"The Asus Laptop L410 is a super-affordable PC, even among budget notebooks, compromising on the display and processing power to deliver a serviceable Windows machine with good battery life and useful ports. The build is reasonably solid, there’s a good mix of ports, battery life is long enough, and it can perform basic everyday tasks. On the flip side, the screen is poor, anything other than basic tasks is a tough ask, and it has little memory and even less storage."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Triton 300 or the ASUS R410MA
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,795
Recommendations made
24,223
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.