When deciding between the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 and the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, consider that the Acer will likely offer stronger gaming and graphics performance and a larger screen, beneficial for immersive gaming and intensive tasks, but will be heavier and have a shorter battery life, which reduces portability. The MSI, on the other hand, will be lighter and boast longer battery life, making it ideal for travel and productivity, but may not handle high-end gaming or demanding applications as well. If portability and battery life are paramount, and your tasks are mainly business-oriented, lean towards the MSI; if gaming or performance-intensive applications are your primary use, the Acer could serve you better even if it's bulkier and requires more frequent charging. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16
Good for gaming and AI
Advantages of the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo
Very good for general use
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good portability
Good battery life
Key differences
Gaming and AI
7.5/10
6.8/10
8.0/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good for gaming and AI, while the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo is only fair.
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16, with its powerful GPU and high screen refresh rate, offers superior gaming and 3D performance, which are crucial for smooth and immersive experiences. While the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo has a capable CPU and good screen quality, its GPU and lower screen refresh rate make it less suited for demanding gaming and 3D tasks.
Screen Quality
7.8/10
8.2/10
16.0in
SIZE
13.0in
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
373.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
415.0 nits
The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo has a better screen than the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
When considering a laptop for general use, the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo's high resolution and brightness make it a superior choice, ensuring crisp and comfortable viewing for everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing. For engineering and design professionals who require color accuracy, both laptops offer quality displays, but the MSI Prestige may edge out with better coverage of professional color gamuts, making it ideal for precise visual work. However, for gaming and 3D applications that benefit from smoother motion, the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16, despite poor screen quality in this area, likely offers a higher refresh rate, providing a more fluid experience, but its overall performance for these tasks is still limited by the display's capabilities.
Battery
5.0 Hours
8.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has 5 hours of battery life. The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo has 8 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Very Good
16.0in
SIZE
13.0in
5.7 lbs
WEIGHT
3.5 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.6in
The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo has very good portability, while the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$799
$1,280
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has a price of $799 and the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo costs $1,280.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo to be very good for general use, while the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good.
The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo, with its superior CPU and RAM, provides a smoother experience for demanding tasks and multitasking, complemented by a high-quality screen and greater portability due to its lighter weight and longer battery life. In contrast, the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16, while also offering a good display and performance for general activities, may fall short in portability and battery life, making it less ideal for on-the-go use but still a competent option for stationary or short-duration use.
Engineering and Design
8.3/10
8.0/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.8/10
8.0/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 and MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo are both very good for engineering and design.
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 offers a powerful CPU, abundant RAM, and a high-performance GPU, coupled with excellent screen quality, making it well-suited for demanding engineering tasks and design work that require robust processing and graphics capabilities. The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo delivers a balance between performance and portability, with a capable CPU, ample RAM, and quality display but has a less powerful GPU, providing a good option for engineering and design professionals who also prioritize a lighter device with a comfortable keyboard and quieter operation.
Content Creation
7.7/10
8.1/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.8/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo to be very good for content creation, while the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.5/10
7.9/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.8/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.5/10
The MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo and Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
7.4/10
7.4/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 and MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 and the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo compare to other laptops
"The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 sacrifices portability and a truly budget price in the name of additional power. While remaining relatively budget-friendly, this gaming laptop packs serious processing chops, and Acer optimizes its internals to deliver respectable 1080p (or 1200p) gameplay from an RTX 4050. Its keyboard and chassis design won't win it any awards, but its display is a cut above for the price."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 or the MSI Prestige 13 AI Evo
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,495
Recommendations made
24,158
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.