The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 offers high performance with a latest generation Intel processor and Nvidia RTX graphics, making it well-suited for intensive engineering tasks, 3D modeling, machine learning, and gaming. However, it's heavier and has shorter battery life, which affects portability. On the other hand, the ASUS Vivobook Go 14, while more affordable and lightweight with longer battery life, is equipped with less powerful AMD hardware and is more suited for general use like web browsing, light productivity tasks, and media consumption. Choose the Acer if performance is a priority and you don't mind the extra weight and cost, or the ASUS for casual use and better portability. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16
Good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good speakers
Good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook Go 14
Very good portability
Good battery life
Key differences
General Use
7.6/10
6.2/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
373.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
250.0 nits
5.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
7.0 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
6.0/10
6.1/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
8.5/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good for general use, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is only fair.
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16, with a powerful CPU, ample RAM, and high-quality screen, excels in general use and offers an immersive experience, especially for CPU-intensive tasks, but is less portable and has shorter battery life, making it less suited for on-the-go work. In contrast, the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is more portable with longer battery life and sufficient capabilities for everyday tasks due to its lighter CPU and RAM configuration, but it may fall short for demanding applications and the screen doesn't match the vibrancy of the Acer.
Gaming and AI
7.5/10
5.7/10
8.0/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is poor.
PerfectRec’s Gaming and AI Score strongly emphasizes graphics processing capability, while also taking into account other factors that impact suitability for gaming and AI work.
Engineering and Design
8.3/10
5.9/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.1/10
8.0/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is poor.
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is equipped with a powerful processor, ample RAM, and a high-quality GPU, which are crucial for demanding engineering and design tasks, as well as a superior screen with better color accuracy and refresh rate. On the other hand, the ASUS Vivobook Go 14, with a less potent processor, less RAM, and a basic GPU, falls short for such tasks, and while it's more portable and quieter, its screen quality and color representation are not on par.
Content Creation
7.7/10
6.5/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.1/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good for content creation, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.5/10
6.4/10
9.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
6.0/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 is good for software development, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.8/10
6.2/10
16.0in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
373.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
250.0 nits
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has a better screen than the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16, with its superior resolution and brightness, offers a clear and vibrant display for everyday tasks and detailed engineering work, but its lower refresh rate can detract from the smooth visuals expected in high-speed gaming and 3D rendering. The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 provides adequate screen resolution and brightness for tasks like web browsing, document editing and some light design work, but it may lack the broader color gamut necessary for precise color work in professional engineering and design applications. For gaming and 3D scenarios, both laptops' screens may not deliver the high refresh rate required for the smoothest experience, which could be a drawback for users with those specific needs.
Battery
5.0 Hours
7.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has 5 hours of battery life. The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has 7 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Very Good
16.0in
SIZE
14.0in
5.7 lbs
WEIGHT
3.0 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has very good portability, while the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
6.5/10
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has good build quality, while the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$799
$450
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 has a price of $799 and the ASUS Vivobook Go 14 costs $450.
"The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 sacrifices portability and a truly budget price in the name of additional power. While remaining relatively budget-friendly, this gaming laptop packs serious processing chops, and Acer optimizes its internals to deliver respectable 1080p (or 1200p) gameplay from an RTX 4050. Its keyboard and chassis design won't win it any awards, but its display is a cut above for the price."
"The lack of a backlit keyboard in this price segment shouldn't sway the buyer the other way. However, it still comes down to user preference. The Vivobook Go 14 is a decent laptop in an extremely competitive price segment. A few omissions are a part of the balancing to reach the price segment. The Asus Vivobook Go 14 is a rare find when it comes to the price to performance ratio."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 or the ASUS Vivobook Go 14
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
126,795
Recommendations made
27,473
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.