If performance during intense gaming, 3D rendering, and machine learning is crucial for you, the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 with its more powerful GPU and CPU may be the better choice. While it provides ample storage and a larger, though equally sharp, screen than its competitor, its weight and size might be less convenient for frequent travel. Conversely, if you prioritize a balance between good performance and more portability at a slightly lower cost, the Acer Predator Helios 300 is a solid option, offering excellent heat management and a vivid display, albeit with less storage and battery life compared to the ASUS model. Keep in mind that both are gaming laptops with quality builds but the ASUS has a significantly longer battery life, which may be handy for extended use away from power outlets. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Helios 300
Good overall display quality
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Very good battery life
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
294.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
3.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
10.0 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
6.9/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for general use, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 stands out for general use due to its higher performance AMD Ryzen 9 processor and double the storage capacity compared to the Acer Predator Helios 300, which although it has a robust Intel i7 CPU and enough RAM for everyday tasks, offers less impressive screen color quality and a significantly shorter battery life that might limit portability and convenience in longer sessions away from a power outlet. Additionally, while both have good build and keyboard quality, the ASUS benefits from a larger screen and better heat management, making it a more comfortable choice for extended use.
Gaming and AI
7.2/10
8.1/10
6.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 offers stronger gaming and 3D performance due to its newer Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU compared to the Acer Predator Helios 300's RTX 3060, providing enhanced graphics processing power; both, however, have equal screen refresh rates of 144Hz, ensuring smooth image rendering during gameplay.
Engineering and Design
7.6/10
8.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
6.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 offers enhanced engineering and design capabilities with a more powerful AMD Ryzen processor and a superior Nvidia RTX GPU than the Acer Predator Helios 300, yielding better overall performance, notably in graphics-intensive tasks, and it also comes with a larger screen size that benefits design work. However, the Acer Predator Helios 300, while slightly less capable in raw performance due to its Intel i7 processor and Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU, may prove to be more portable and have a quieter operating noise, which can influence user experience and comfort.
Content Creation
7.3/10
8.1/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
7.7/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and Acer Predator Helios 300 are both good for software development, though the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
6.8/10
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 for general use, gaming and AI, and engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has a better screen for content creation, and software development.
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has a screen that offers clear visuals and vivid colors suitable for day-to-day activities and detailed engineering work due to its resolution and color accuracy, but it falls short for gaming and 3D work, likely because it doesn't have a high refresh rate, which is crucial for smooth motion. The ASUS TUF Gaming A17's screen provides an acceptable level of clarity and color representation for both general tasks and technical design work, but like the Helios, it isn’t optimal for gaming or 3D applications, most likely because it too lacks a high refresh rate and may not have the best resolution or panel technology desired by gamers and professionals in 3D modeling. These tradeoffs are important depending on whether your priority is work in engineering and design, where color fidelity is key, or gaming and 3D rendering, which demand faster refresh rates for a seamless visual experience.
Battery
3.5 Hours
10.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has 3.5 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has 10 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Cost
$1,099
$1,552
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has a price of $1,099 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 costs $1,552.
"The Acer Predator Helios 300 review is an overclocked gaming laptop with a good display. The Predator is large, heavy, and loud, but also offers plenty of performance according to gamers. An overclocked gaming laptop - or its user - also has to struggle with the usual disadvantages we mentioned above. On the other hand, overclocking is optional, and those who like it quieter and can live with a few less frames per second can also switch to the significantly more moderate Standard mode. Then the Helios 300 won't be any louder than the competitors."
"There is one big question that needs an answer. Is the TUF Gaming A17 FA707 a better purchase than the ROG Strix G17 G713R (2022)? Well, it depends. Undoubtedly, the Strix is the more premium product. Arguably the biggest advantage it has over its TUF fellow is in regards to the display. ASUS TUF Gaming A17 A707’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles, and a very good contrast ratio."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Helios 300 or the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
125,895
Recommendations made
27,278
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.