Acer Predator Helios 300 vs ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2024)

The Acer Predator Helios 300 offers a balanced mix of CPU and RAM for everyday tasks, but the ASUS ROG Strix G16 stands out with its superior screen quality and slightly better performance for demanding applications. While both are not particularly portable due to their size and weight, the Helios 300 typically trails the Strix G16 in battery life, making the ASUS more suitable for extended use away from a power source.

The Acer Predator Helios 300 is fitted with a capable GPU and a high screen refresh rate, ensuring smooth gameplay and effective handling of 3D tasks, though it might not match the ASUS ROG Strix G16, which boasts an even more powerful GPU and higher refresh rates for top-tier gaming performance. Despite both having strong CPUs and good screen quality, the ROG Strix G16's superior graphics hardware makes it a more desirable option for those seeking the best gaming and 3D experiences.

The Acer Predator Helios 300 provides solid performance with a capable CPU, enough RAM, and a decent GPU, making it suitable for engineering tasks and design work, while the screen quality ensures crisp visuals. On the other hand, the ASUS ROG Strix G16 offers even better performance with a more powerful CPU and GPU combo, additional RAM for complex tasks, and superior screen resolution for detailed design projects, though it may be less portable and noisier under load.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

If you prioritize a sharp and vibrant display for everyday tasks like browsing and watching videos, both the Acer Predator Helios 300 and ASUS ROG Strix G16 provide high-resolution screens with excellent brightness and color clarity. For engineering and design where accurate color representation is crucial, both laptops offer displays with wide color gamut coverage, ensuring that your designs will look consistent and true to life. However, for gaming and 3D applications that demand fluid motion, both models fall short, as they have lower refresh rates, which may not provide the smoothest visual experience in fast-paced scenes or when rendering quick movements.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.