Choosing between the Acer Predator Helios 300 and the Acer Swift X 16 involves considering factors like performance, portability, and battery life. The Predator Helios 300 is equipped with a powerful processor and high-performance graphics card, making it suitable for gaming and engineering applications; however, it's heavier and has a shorter battery life, which affects portability. On the other hand, the Swift X 16 is lighter and offers a longer battery life, making it more portable and convenient for general use or work on the go. Both have high-quality displays and are capable of handling demanding tasks, but the Swift X 16 has a higher resolution and larger screen size, providing better screen real estate for multitasking and creative work. If mobility and long battery life are your priority, the Swift X 16 is a wiser choice, whereas if you require more intensive gaming or computational capabilities, the Predator Helios 300 would be preferable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Helios 300
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has no clear advantages over the Acer Swift X 16.
Advantages of the Acer Swift X 16
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good portability
Good battery life
Very good speakers
Very good keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.4/10
8.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
294.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
402.0 nits
3.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
8.0 Hours
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.0/10
6.9/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.6/10
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for general use, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
While both the Acer Predator Helios 300 and the Acer Swift X 16 have the same amount of RAM and capable CPUs for handling general tasks, the Swift X 16 stands out with its higher-resolution screen, longer battery life, and being more portable, making it more versatile for general use. The Predator Helios 300, although good for general activities, offers less screen clarity, has a shorter battery life, and is bulkier which can be less convenient for users frequently on the move.
Engineering and Design
7.6/10
8.2/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
6.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
The Acer Swift X 16 stands out with superior screen resolution and quality, along with greater processing power from a newer AMD CPU, which can better handle multitasking and demanding engineering software compared to the Acer Predator Helios 300, which though powerful with an Intel CPU and high-grade GPU, is heavier and has a lower screen resolution that might not be as crisp for detailed design work. In terms of portability and usability, the Swift X 16 is significantly lighter and has a better battery life, making it more suitable for on-the-go engineering tasks, while the Helios 300 is bulkier with a shorter battery life but might be preferred for stationary work due to its robust gaming-grade graphics.
Content Creation
7.3/10
8.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
8.0/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.0/10
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for software development, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
8.2/10
15.6in
SIZE
16.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
402.0 nits
The Acer Swift X 16 has a better screen than the Acer Predator Helios 300 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has a balanced screen suitable for general use and engineering with respectable resolution and brightness, but for gaming and 3D applications, its lower refresh rate isn't ideal. The Acer Swift X 16 offers a screen with higher resolution and color accuracy, making it great for general tasks and engineering design work that depends on color detail. However, both laptops have screens with refresh rates that aren't high enough for the smooth visuals desired in gaming and 3D modeling, which prioritize quick image rendering to reduce motion blur.
Battery
3.5 Hours
8.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has 3.5 hours of battery life. The Acer Swift X 16 has 8 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Good
15.6in
SIZE
16.0in
5.5 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The Acer Swift X 16 has good portability, while the Acer Predator Helios 300 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
The Acer Predator Helios 300 and Acer Swift X 16 are both good for gaming and AI.
PerfectRec’s Gaming and AI Score strongly emphasizes graphics processing capability, while also taking into account other factors that impact suitability for gaming and AI work.
Build Quality
7.4/10
7.6/10
The Acer Swift X 16 and Acer Predator Helios 300 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,204
$1,250
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
The Acer Predator Helios 300 has a price of $1,204 and the Acer Swift X 16 costs $1,250.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Predator Helios 300 and the Acer Swift X 16 compare to other laptops
"The Acer Predator Helios 300 review is an overclocked gaming laptop with a good display. The Predator is large, heavy, and loud, but also offers plenty of performance according to gamers. An overclocked gaming laptop - or its user - also has to struggle with the usual disadvantages we mentioned above. On the other hand, overclocking is optional, and those who like it quieter and can live with a few less frames per second can also switch to the significantly more moderate Standard mode. Then the Helios 300 won't be any louder than the competitors."
"Acer’s Swift X 16 is an excellent choice for shoppers who want a 16-inch laptop and care more for performance than attractive design or long battery life. The Swift X 16’s gorgeous OLED display, spacious keyboard, and big touchpad make it pleasant to use in basic day-to-day tasks. It also has an AMD Ryzen 9 processor and Nvidia RTX 4050 graphics, which combine to deliver good performance in a wide variety of productivity applications and games. A few minor mistakes, like poorly-placed USB-C ports that lack DisplayPort, will turn off some shoppers, but those who can accept its shortcomings will find the Swift X 16 a versatile daily driver."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Helios 300 or the Acer Swift X 16
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,495
Recommendations made
24,158
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.