The Acer Nitro 5 17 is well suited for intensive engineering tasks, 3D work, machine learning, and gaming due to its powerful AMD Ryzen processor and high-end Nvidia graphics card. It also has a larger, higher resolution display, which is good for productivity and entertainment, but this means it's heavier and less portable. On the other hand, the ASUS R410MA is much more affordable and lightweight, making it a better choice for general use like web browsing, document editing, and other basic tasks. Its Intel Celeron processor and integrated graphics, however, are not ideal for demanding applications or gaming. The Acer also has a significantly larger storage capacity and more memory, which contributes to better multitasking and performance for challenging software. If you're on a tight budget and only need a laptop for simple tasks, the ASUS R410MA could meet your needs while saving you money, but for more demanding use, the Acer Nitro 5 17 would be the better option despite its higher cost and reduced portability. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 5 17
Good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good speakers
Good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS R410MA
Very good portability
Key differences
General Use
7.8/10
5.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
307.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
6.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
8.5 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
5.3/10
6.0/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
8.5/10
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is good for general use, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is well-suited for general use due to its powerful CPU, substantial RAM, high-quality IPS display, and dedicated graphics, making it responsive and visually satisfying for a variety of tasks, albeit with a heftier build and shorter battery life. In contrast, the ASUS R410MA is less suitable for general use because it has a much weaker CPU, less RAM, a lower-resolution TN screen that offers poorer viewing angles and color, and while it's lighter and offers longer battery life, these features do not compensate for its overall performance limitations.
Gaming and AI
7.7/10
5.4/10
7.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Nitro 5 17 excels in gaming and 3D because of its powerful Nvidia RTX 3080 GPU and a high refresh rate screen which is important for smooth visuals in fast-paced games. Meanwhile, ASUS R410MA falls short in these areas because it lacks a dedicated high-performance GPU and its screen has a lower refresh rate that would result in less fluid gaming and 3D graphics experiences.
Engineering and Design
8.0/10
5.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
7.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is very good for engineering and design, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The Acer Nitro 5 17 excels in engineering and design due to its high-performance CPU and graphics card, ample RAM, and high-quality screen, providing the necessary power and visual clarity for demanding tasks. In contrast, the ASUS R410MA, with its entry-level CPU and minimal RAM, lacks the computational muscle and display quality necessary for such specialized applications.
Content Creation
7.8/10
5.7/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is good for content creation, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.4/10
5.6/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
5.3/10
The Acer Nitro 5 17 is good for software development, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.2/10
5.1/10
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1366 x 768
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
TN
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
307.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
The Acer Nitro 5 17 has a better screen than the ASUS R410MA for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
If you prioritize a vibrant display for everyday tasks, the Acer Nitro 5 17's superior resolution and brightness can make visuals pop, offering an enhanced experience over the ASUS R410MA. For engineering and design, the Acer's wider color range would provide more accurate color representation, essential for detailed work, while the ASUS falls short in this aspect. And if gaming or handling 3D graphics is your focus, the Acer's lower refresh rate could hinder performance, despite its better resolution and panel type, which are only moderately critical compared to the importance of smooth motion rendered by high refresh rates.
Battery
6.0 Hours
8.5 Hours
The Acer Nitro 5 17 has 6 hours of battery life. The ASUS R410MA has 8.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Very Good
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
5.9 lbs
WEIGHT
2.8 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The ASUS R410MA has very good portability, while the Acer Nitro 5 17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.2/10
5.1/10
The Acer Nitro 5 17 has good build quality, while the ASUS R410MA has poor build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$830
$260
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Acer Nitro 5 17 has a price of $830 and the ASUS R410MA costs $260.
"The Acer Nitro 5 17 is a solid mid-range gamer. The Nitro 5 does not belong to the top group of RTX 3070 notebooks: Compared with the RTX 3070 notebooks tested so far, the computer delivers below-average frame rates - this is due to the 100-watt TGP. The GPU performance can be increased a bit with a firmware update. The device scores with a high level of CPU performance. Throttling is not a concern. CPU and GPU can produce their performance constantly. The laptop heats up moderately under load. The noise development is on the usual class level."
"The Asus Laptop L410 is a super-affordable PC, even among budget notebooks, compromising on the display and processing power to deliver a serviceable Windows machine with good battery life and useful ports. The build is reasonably solid, there’s a good mix of ports, battery life is long enough, and it can perform basic everyday tasks. On the flip side, the screen is poor, anything other than basic tasks is a tough ask, and it has little memory and even less storage."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 5 17 or the ASUS R410MA
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
127,395
Recommendations made
27,603
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.