Based on your considerations between the Acer Aspire 5 17 and the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14, if a larger screen and a slightly better battery life appeal to you, and you can handle a bit of extra weight and a slightly larger body, the Acer might be the choice for you. However, if you prioritize a higher resolution OLED display for more vibrant colors and crisp graphics, superior portability due to its smaller size and lighter weight, along with better overall performance for more demanding tasks like 3D work and engineering, then the ASUS would more likely meet your needs, despite its lower storage capacity. Keep in mind that both are priced similarly in the lower midrange, and while the Acer offers a full-size keyboard with a numpad, the ASUS provides an overall higher build quality and better screen for creative tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Aspire 5 17
The Acer Aspire 5 17 has no clear advantages over the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14.
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14
Good for engineering and design
Very good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Very good portability
Good speakers
Key differences
Screen Quality
6.2/10
8.4/10
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
OLED
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
90Hz
266.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
385.0 nits
The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 has a better screen than the Acer Aspire 5 17 for general use, gaming and AI, and engineering and design.
For general use, the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 stands out due to its higher resolution and brightness, providing crisper visuals and better readability in various lighting conditions, while the Acer Aspire 5 17's screen is acceptable for everyday tasks but lacks that sharpness and vibrance. In engineering and design, the Vivobook's superior color accuracy, covering a wider range of color gamuts like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB, makes it ideal for professionals needing precise color representation, whereas the Aspire 5 17 falls short in this aspect. However, both laptops are not optimal for gaming and 3D applications since they don't have high refresh rates, which are crucial to ensure smooth motion and gameplay.
Battery
7.0 Hours
8.0 Hours
The Acer Aspire 5 17 has 7 hours of battery life. The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 has 8 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Very Good
17.3in
SIZE
14.0in
4.6 lbs
WEIGHT
3.0 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 has very good portability, while the Acer Aspire 5 17 has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.5/10
7.4/10
The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 has good build quality, while the Acer Aspire 5 17 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$700
$548
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Acer Aspire 5 17 has a price of $700 and the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 costs $548.
The Acer Aspire 5 17 and ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 are both good for general use.
The Acer Aspire 5 17 offers a larger screen with good portability for its size and long battery life, favorable for extended general use sessions, but has lower screen resolution and color quality compared to the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14, which showcases a high-quality OLED screen with excellent color accuracy, making it more suitable for tasks that benefit from high screen quality, despite its smaller size and storage capacity.
Gaming and AI
6.2/10
6.1/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
90Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Aspire 5 17 and ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 are both only fair for gaming and AI.
The Acer Aspire 5 17 and the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 both offer fair gaming and 3D performance due to their integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics, which provide decent but not top-of-the-line power for demanding tasks. However, the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 pushes ahead with a higher screen refresh rate, offering smoother visuals, which is a significant plus for gaming, compared to the Acer Aspire 5 17's standard refresh rate.
Engineering and Design
6.7/10
7.0/10
6.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
5.0/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.7/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 to be good for engineering and design, while the Acer Aspire 5 17 is only fair.
The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 excels in engineering and design use primarily due to its more capable CPU and superior OLED screen with higher resolution and refresh rate, which affords more vivid colors and smoother visuals. In contrast, the Acer Aspire 5 17, while offering similar RAM and GPU capabilities, falls short with a less powerful CPU and an IPS screen that doesn't match the color range or sharpness of the ASUS, making it only fair for such uses.
Content Creation
7.2/10
7.3/10
6.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
5.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
OLED
The ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 and Acer Aspire 5 17 are both good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.2/10
7.2/10
6.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
5.0/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2880 x 1800
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Aspire 5 17 and ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Aspire 5 17 and the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14 compare to other laptops
"The Acer Aspire 5 17 laptop shows the expected strengths in the test. Besides the usual high build quality, the configuration convinces in most benchmarks and tests. The combination of CPU, GPU, and RAM is absolutely sufficient for the everyday office and browsing tasks of a laptop. It also renders the odd game passably if the requirements aren't too high. We liked the matte display in the test as well as the fairly manageable dimensions despite the screen size. It can also be used outdoors, even if it's certainly not a laptop designed for mobility."
"The Asus Vivobook Pro 14 OLED is a Pantone Validated laptop that packs a lot of processing power. The Asus VivoBook Pro 14 OLED's highlight is its outstanding display: Featuring a 3K resolution in the 16:10 format and nearly a 100% coverage of the Display P3 color space, the display hardly leaves anything to be desired. The Asus laptop also shows impeccable rates in terms of general system performance. Combined with long battery life, low noise emissions, and relatively good speakers, the laptop can be recommended to users who can accept compromises in terms of connectivity."
Get a great deal on the Acer Aspire 5 17 or the ASUS Vivobook Pro 14
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
109,695
Recommendations made
23,768
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.