Acer Aspire 5 15 vs ASUS Vivobook 15X

For general use, the Acer Aspire 5 and ASUS Vivobook 15X offer screen quality that is adequate due to their resolution and brightness, which makes them suitable for everyday tasks such as browsing the web or working with office applications, but they might fall short in terms of high-end visual clarity. In the realm of engineering and design, where accurate color representation is vital, both laptops provide only basic color coverage, lacking wide color gamuts necessary for precision work with visuals and graphics. Meanwhile, for gaming and 3D applications, both the Acer and ASUS models are hindered by their lower refresh rates, which can impair smoothness and responsiveness during fast-paced action or complex animations, despite having acceptable resolution and panel types for entry-level experiences.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The Acer Aspire 5 15 with its higher RAM, better battery capacity, and superior heat management stands out as a solid choice for general use; despite a slightly dimmer screen and a marginally heavier build, these features contribute to consistent performance and usability. The ASUS Vivobook 15X, while lighter and offering better screen colors, falls short with less RAM and a lower-quality keyboard, making it less optimal for intensive tasks and extended typing sessions.

The Acer Aspire 5 15 and ASUS Vivobook 15X are considered fair for gaming and 3D tasks primarily due to their integrated GPUs, which are adequate for lighter gaming but lack the power for high-end games, and their standard screen refresh rates, which do not exceed the typical 60Hz found in everyday laptops, thus limiting smoother gameplay. While the Acer has more RAM which is beneficial for multitasking and can slightly improve gaming performance, both devices sport processors and screen qualities that are acceptable for general use but do not stand out for gaming purposes.

The Acer Aspire 5 15 is better suited for engineering and design use because it has more RAM and a higher performing CPU, which are crucial for running demanding software efficiently. Although the ASUS Vivobook 15X is more portable due to its slightly lower weight and has a marginally higher battery capacity for longer use on-the-go, its lower amount of RAM and weaker CPU make it less ideal for intensive tasks such as those found in engineering and design-related work.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.