Acer Aspire 3 15 vs Razer Blade 18

The Razer Blade 18 outperforms the Acer Aspire 3 15 due to its significantly more powerful CPU and greater amount of RAM, leading to a much better performance in general use; the Blade's superior screen quality enhances user experience further, although the tradeoffs include less portability due to its larger size and significantly lower battery life. While the Aspire 3 15 offers quiet operation and longer battery life, making it more suited for on-the-go users, its general use is hampered by a less robust CPU, less RAM, and a screen with lower resolution and color accuracy.

The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for gaming and 3D because it features a powerful Nvidia RTX GPU and a high screen refresh rate, providing smooth and detailed gameplay visuals. Conversely, the Acer Aspire 3 15 has a more basic AMD Radeon GPU and a standard refresh rate which, while adequate for casual gaming, doesn't support the advanced graphics and rapid motion seen in more intensive gaming and 3D applications.

The Acer Aspire 3 15, with its AMD Ryzen 3 CPU and AMD Radeon GPU, is adequate for lighter engineering and design tasks but may fall short for more demanding work, while the Razer Blade 18 excels due to its far more powerful Intel i9 CPU and Nvidia RTX GPU, which are better suited for intensive engineering applications. Additionally, the Razer Blade has a higher quality screen and significantly more RAM, which are crucial for design work, though its larger size and weight make it less portable than the Acer Aspire 3 15.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

For general use, the Acer Aspire 3's screen may offer enough resolution and brightness for everyday activities like web browsing or word processing, but it lacks the superior panel technology and higher brightness of the Razer Blade 18, which ensures clearer and more vivid images. In engineering and design, the Razer Blade 18's screen delivers a wider range of colors covering professional color gamuts, making it better suited for precision work, while the Acer Aspire 3's display may fall short in color accuracy. When it comes to gaming and 3D applications, despite their high resolutions and acceptable panel types, neither laptop excels due to low refresh rates, leading to less fluid motion and gameplay compared to screens designed specifically for these purposes.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.