Acer Aspire 3 15 vs ASUS Vivobook 16X

The ASUS Vivobook 16X offers better general use capabilities due to possessing a more powerful CPU, double the RAM, higher screen brightness and color accuracy, along with a larger and higher resolution screen than the Acer Aspire 3 15; however, the Acer is lighter which may be more appealing for those prioritizing portability, even though it doesn't perform as well as the ASUS in processing tasks and has a shorter battery life.

The ASUS Vivobook 16X provides a better gaming and 3D experience due to its more powerful Nvidia RTX 4060 GPU and a higher screen refresh rate of 120Hz, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 has a less capable AMD Radeon 610M graphics card and a lower refresh rate of 60Hz. Additionally, the Vivobook's superior CPU contributes to its overall better performance for these tasks, even though the screen quality is only slightly better than that of the Aspire 3 15.

PerfectRec’s Engineering and Design Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for graphic design and 3D rendering work.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

When considering general use, the Acer Aspire 3 has a fair screen overall because its resolution and brightness are adequate for day-to-day tasks, but it's the panel type that may not deliver the most vivid colors or wide viewing angles. The ASUS Vivobook 16X offers a good viewing experience with higher resolution and brightness, providing clearer and more vibrant visuals which are beneficial for both general use and detailed work in engineering and design, although its color gamut coverage might not match professional-grade monitors. However, both laptops have screens that aren't ideal for gaming and 3D applications, as they lack the high refresh rates necessary for smooth motion, alongside only moderate resolution and panel types that don't prioritize the fast response times gamers often seek.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.