Choosing between the Acer Aspire 3 15 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 depends on your needs and budget. The Acer is less expensive and has a longer battery life, making it more portable and suitable for general use and tasks that require long battery hours. However, its performance for demanding tasks like 3D rendering, machine learning, and gaming is more limited due to its less powerful processor and graphics. On the other hand, the ASUS is more expensive but offers significantly better performance for intensive tasks and gaming, thanks to its superior processor and graphics card. It also has a better screen for fast-motion content and more RAM and storage, but it's heavier and has a shorter battery life, reducing its portability. If you prioritize performance and gaming capabilities, the ASUS might be the better choice, while the Acer is suitable for budget-conscious users requiring a device for everyday tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Aspire 3 15
Good portability
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Good overall build quality
Very good battery life
Good speakers
Good keyboard
Key differences
General Use
6.6/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
244.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
9.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
10.0 Hours
6.2/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
7.6/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for general use, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is only fair.
The Acer Aspire 3 15 is equipped with a respectable AMD Ryzen 3 CPU and 8GB of RAM, making it capable for routine tasks but may fall short in more demanding applications, and while its battery life and silent operation are appreciated, its smaller storage and less robust build quality limit its overall performance for general use. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 features a more powerful AMD Ryzen 9 CPU and 16GB of RAM, offers a larger storage capacity and better overall build, which along with its superior heat management and higher quality screen, provides a much better experience for a variety of uses despite being less portable due to its larger size and heavier weight.
Gaming and AI
5.8/10
8.1/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
10.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is poor.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 provides superior gaming and 3D experiences primarily due to its Nvidia RTX 4070 graphics card and higher screen refresh rate, which are very important for smooth and visually detailed gaming performance. In contrast, the Acer Aspire 3 15, with its AMD Radeon 610M GPU and standard refresh rate, offers modest gaming capabilities, which, while adequate for casual play, won't deliver the same level of immersion or smoothness in graphics-heavy tasks.
Engineering and Design
5.9/10
8.3/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is poor.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 offers superior performance for engineering and design tasks, equipped with a more powerful CPU and GPU setup and double the RAM of the Acer Aspire 3 15, along with considerably larger storage capacity and a higher refresh rate display for smoother visuals.
Content Creation
7.0/10
8.1/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.0/10
7.7/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.2/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
6.2/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 and Acer Aspire 3 15 are both good for software development, though the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.2/10
6.8/10
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
244.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
253.0 nits
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has a better screen than the Acer Aspire 3 15 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, both the Acer Aspire 3 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 offer screens that meet basic needs with adequate resolution and brightness but don't stand out for exceptional clarity or color depth. Engineering and design professionals may find the color accuracy and range insufficient on these models since they lack the wide color gamuts necessary for precise color work. Gamers and those into 3D applications will likely be disappointed by the lower refresh rates, which don't support the smooth visuals typically desired in fast-paced games or high-frame-rate 3D modeling.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
3.9 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.2/10
7.2/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A17 has good build quality, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$330
$1,552
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has a price of $330 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 costs $1,552.
Alexander Tozzi, Ryan Lim, and Yannick Khong | March 2023
"The Acer Aspire 3 is okay for school use. It feels reasonably well-built, and it's easy to carry around. The display looks decently sharp and provides plenty of space for multitasking, but it doesn't get bright enough to combat glare. Its Intel Core i3-N305 CPU and integrated graphics can only handle simple tasks, like text processing, web browsing, and video playback, so it isn't ideal for students in more technical fields like 3D graphics. Unfortunately, the battery lasts only around six to seven hours of light use."
"There is one big question that needs an answer. Is the TUF Gaming A17 FA707 a better purchase than the ROG Strix G17 G713R (2022)? Well, it depends. Undoubtedly, the Strix is the more premium product. Arguably the biggest advantage it has over its TUF fellow is in regards to the display. ASUS TUF Gaming A17 A707’s IPS panel has a Full HD resolution, comfortable viewing angles, and a very good contrast ratio."
Get a great deal on the Acer Aspire 3 15 or the ASUS TUF Gaming A17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
124,095
Recommendations made
26,888
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.