A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec Earbuds or Headphones team Learn more
Updated April 10, 2024·
For immersive music experiences with very good overall sound quality, the Beyerdynamic 770 Pro would be the better choice, although they might not be as comfortable if you plan on extended use, given their lower comfort score. They are wired, meaning you won't experience latency issues, which is great for TV and video watching but limits your mobility compared to wireless options. The JBL 510BT offers the convenience of wireless connectivity and is optimized for use with AAC codec, which could be important if you're using Apple devices. Additionally, they have a longer battery life and are more affordable, but their sound quality and noise isolation are less impressive compared to the Beyerdynamic. If you're looking to save money and prioritize portability and casual use, including features like wireless connectivity and built-in controls, the JBL 510BT might suit your needs. However, for studio-like sound and less consideration for budget and wireless features, the Beyerdynamic 770 Pro stands out. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm)
- Very good for music
- Very good for TV and video
Advantages of the JBL 510BT
- Good for air travel
Key differences
Music
8.6
6.2
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) is very good for music, while the JBL 510BT is only fair.
Gaming
6.5
5.4
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) is only fair for gaming, while the JBL 510BT is poor.
Phone Calls
3.8
5.1
The JBL 510BT and Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) are both poor for phone calls, though the JBL 510BT is somewhat better.
TV and Video
8.2
5.5
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) is very good for TV and video, while the JBL 510BT is poor.
Noise Reduction
6.0
5.3
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) is only fair for noise reduction, while the JBL 510BT is poor.
Battery
N/A
38.0 Hours
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) does not have a battery. The JBL 510BT has 38 hours of battery life.
Cost
$170
$30
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) has a price of $170 and the JBL 510BT costs $30.
Build Quality
8.0
6.5
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) has very good build quality, while the JBL 510BT has only fair build quality.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect Headphones
Find your new headphones
Key similarities
Podcasts and Audiobooks
5.9
5.6
The Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) and JBL 510BT are both poor for podcasts and audiobooks.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) and the JBL 510BT compare to other earbuds and headphones
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) | JBL 510BT |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$170 | $30 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | Beyerdynamic | JBL | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | January 1, 1985 | February 1, 2021 | |
Form Factor | |||
Form Factor | Headphones | Headphones | |
Connectivity | |||
Connectivity | Wired | Wireless | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Music Score | |||
Music Score | 8.7/10 | 6.2/10 | |
Phone Calls Score | |||
Phone Calls Score | 3.9/10 | 5.2/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 6.6/10 | 5.5/10 | |
TV and Video Score | |||
TV and Video Score | 8.2/10 | 5.6/10 | |
Exercise Score | |||
Exercise Score | 4.5/10 | 5.8/10 | |
PERFORMANCE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Battery life | |||
Battery life | N/A | 38 Hours | |
Wireless charging | |||
Wireless charging | N/A | No | |
Charging time | |||
Charging time | N/A | 2 Hours | |
Bluetooth version | |||
Bluetooth version | N/A | 5 | |
FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Active Noise Cancelling | |||
Active Noise Cancelling | No | No | |
Noise Reduction Score | |||
Noise Reduction Score | 6/10 | 5.3/10 | |
Virtual Surround | |||
Virtual Surround | N/A | No | |
Mic Quality | |||
Mic Quality | N/A | 7/10 | |
BUILD AND DESIGN | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Build Quality | |||
Build Quality | 8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Comfort score | |||
Comfort score | 8.4/10 | 5.5/10 | |
Weight (headset or single earbud) | |||
Weight (headset or single earbud) | 272.1 Grams | 158.7 Grams | |
Microphone style | |||
Microphone style | N/A | Integrated | |
Waterproof Rating | |||
Waterproof Rating | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Headphones.com
Sebastian Taboada | September 2022
"Altogether, when you consider its accessible price tag, the performance, the build, and its outstanding comfort, I think that the DT770 Pro is fantastic option for anyone looking for a closed-back headphone in the sub-$1,000 range, and I can confidently give it a strong recommendation."
JBL 510BT
See more
Dig into reviews and images
SoundGuys
Sam Smart | September 2023
"The JBL Tune 510BT is affordable and compact, making it a great companion for a commute, so long as you don't need active noise canceling. If you wear glasses or have ear piercings, the on-ear design might not be comfortable, since the ear cups will squish your ears."
Get a great deal on the Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) or the JBL 510BT
About Beyerdynamic
Beyerdynamic is a German, family-owned, century-old, audio system manufacturer. They produce a wide array of professional-quality products such as microphones, aviation headsets, conference systems and headphones. The company has served as the main provider of audio equipment for German entertainment events like tours by the Beatles and Elton John and even government entities like the German Parliament.
About JBL
JBL is an American audio equipment manufacturer. Owned by Harman International which is, itself, owned by Samsung Electronics. JBL markets a wide array of monitoring speakers, professional headphones and consumer market headphones and earbuds. It was founded in 1946 by James Bullough Lansing (whose initials give the company its name) and has become one of the most prolific audio companies ever. Their products were responsible for audio during the 1969 Woodstock Festival.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
Earbuds or Headphones guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
Compare Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) vs. Bang and Olufsen Beoplay EQ
VS
Compare Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) vs. Sony Linkbuds
VS
Compare Beyerdynamic 770 Pro (80 ohm) vs. Apple Airpods (3rd generation)
VS
Compare JBL 510BT vs. JBL Vibe Beam True Wireless
VS
Compare JBL 510BT vs. Creative Labs Outlier Air V3
VS
Compare JBL 510BT vs. Skullcandy Dime 2
VS
FAQs
FAQs about earbuds and headphones
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec earbuds & headphones team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest earbuds or headphones information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
108
Earbuds and headphones evaluated
11,340
Earbuds and headphones stats compiled
15
Proprietary Earbuds and headphones ratings developed
95,300
Recommendations made
14,295
Consumer hours saved
About the Earbuds or Headphones team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Earbuds and Headphones Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Luis Torres
Earbuds and Headphones Expert
Luis is a Mexico-based headphones expert. He’s been making headphone recommendations for five years and has close to 100 pairs in his personal collection.
Featured in
