A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Xeneon 27QHD240
Company ProductName Specs




27GR95QE
Company ProductName Specs




Advantages of the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
  • The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.9
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
8.3
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
113 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both very good for competitive gaming, though the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$900
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
$1,000
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) has a price of $900 and the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,000.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
9.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
113 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
639 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
656 nits
97.3 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.7
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

7.5
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
7.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
113 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
639 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
656 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
Yes
Both the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
Yes
Both the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
No
Both the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
Xeneon 27QHD240
27GR95QE
No
Both the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED) and the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$900
$1,000
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
113 nits196 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
639 nits656 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms3.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.7/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

PC Gamer

Jorge Jimenez | March 2023
"The LG 27GR95QE-B is a stellar display that makes 1440p again the PC gaming sweet spot due to its high 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic latency. However, its low overall brightness and lack of onboard settings keep it from being great."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo