A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




PG49WCD
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize a wider screen and higher resolution for an immersive gaming and media experience, the Asus PG49WCD with its larger screen might be the right choice, despite its higher price. However, if you want a monitor that offers exceptional responsiveness for competitive gaming and is also suitable for everyday productivity, the less expensive Acer X27U would be a better fit. Note that the Acer's smaller screen size may limit its capacity for media consumption when compared to the Asus, but it provides better value for mixed usage, particularly if budget is a concern. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
PG49WCD
5.4
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
413 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
PG49WCD
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
413 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
PG49WCD
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
PG49WCD
9.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
413 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
PG49WCD
5.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
PG49WCD
$1,026
Product imageProduct image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) costs $1,026.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
PG49WCD
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
PG49WCD
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
PG49WCD
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$1,026
Screen Size
27"49"
Resolution
2560 x 14405120 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz144Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits413 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nits468 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,600
Recommendations made
18,840
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo