HP 14" Laptop vs MSI GF63 Thin

PerfectRec’s General Use Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for general productivity, web browsing, streaming, video calls, and running a wide variety of apps and programs.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

For general use, factors like resolution and panel type affect the clarity and sharpness of the screen, and if both laptops have just fair quality, it suggests they may have lower resolutions or non-IPS panels, resulting in less vibrant colors and narrower viewing angles. For engineering and design, accurate color representation is crucial, so fair screen quality implies these laptops do not cover a wide color gamut, affecting precision in color-sensitive tasks. Lastly, 3D applications benefit from smoother visuals provided by higher refresh rates, and with poor quality for this use, both laptops likely have standard refresh rates that do not support fast-paced graphics as well as specialized gaming laptops.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The HP 14" Laptop's fair gaming and 3D performance can be credited to its integrated AMD GPU, which is adequate for light gaming but not as capable as discrete GPUs for more intensive tasks; additionally, both laptops have a screen refresh rate of 60Hz which is standard but not ideal for fast-paced gaming where higher rates are beneficial. Meanwhile, the MSI GF63 Thin also delivers fair gaming and 3D experiences due to its Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q discrete GPU, which provides better graphical performance than integrated options but still falls short of higher-end gaming laptops, combined with the same standard screen refresh rate.

The HP 14" Laptop and the MSI GF63 Thin are both considered fair for engineering and design use because they offer adequate processing power and RAM for moderate tasks, but their GPUs may struggle with more demanding engineering applications and high-end design work. While the HP's Vega 7 integrated graphics are less powerful than the MSI's Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q dedicated GPU, the difference in screen quality is minimal; both have IPS displays with similar resolutions but the MSI has a slightly larger screen, better for detailed work but at the expense of reduced portability and increased weight compared to the HP 14".